• No results found

Input impedance [k Ω]

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Input impedance [k Ω]"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

HIGH FREQUENCY MODELS FOR AIR-CORE

REACTORS USING 3D EQUIVALENT CIRCUIT THEORY Mathias A. Enohnyaket & Jonas Ekman

EISLAB

Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering Luleå University of Technology

97187, Luleå Sweden, emc@csee.ltu.se

(2)

Outline

¾ Background

¾ Method

¾ Air-core reactor structure

¾ Numerical examples, PEEC model results against measurements

¾ Conclusions

(3)

Background

¾ Project goal: introduce, evaluate and develop the PEEC method for combined electric and EM modeling of reactors.

¾ Applications of reactors: current limiting, neutral grounding, filtering, and shunting.

¾ Faster switching operations in PE components used in power distribution systems demand for HF (a few MHz) electromagnetic (EM) models.

¾ HF model for air-core reactor requires detailed discretization of the windings.

¾ Partial Element Equivalent Circuit (PEEC) method, developed at IBM Research

Center, Yorktown (NY), to study cross-talk on PCB’s, is accurate even at high

frequencies, and same model can be used in both time and frequency domain

analysis.

(4)

The PEEC method

Starting from the expressioin for the total electric field in free space

Rewritten to the EFIE using definitions of EM potentials:

By mathematical manipulation, interpreted as Kirchoffs voltage law for

basic PEEC cell.

(5)

Interpretation of PEEC method

¾ Adjacent nodes connected through self partial inductances.

¾ Mutual partial inductances represents the magnetic field coupling between volume cells.

¾ Each node is connected to infinity through self coefficients of potential.

¾ Mutual coefficients of potential represents the E-field coupling between the surface cells

¾ System is assembled using KVL and KCL.

¾ Software used is developed by Luleå University of Technology (SW), University of L’Aquila (IT), and IBM T.J. Watson Research Center (USA). See further:

http://www.csee.ltu.se/peec

(6)

Reactor PEEC model

¾ Each turn is discretized into finite number of rectangular bars in the current direction.

¾ For each volume cell there is a surface cell (charge) discretisation.

¾ Computes partial inductances L

p

and resistances R for each volume cell using closed formulas.

¾ Computes coefficients of potential P

from surface cells.

PEEC-model for 4 turn reactor using 14 segements per turn.

(7)

Numerical example for rectangular reactor model

¾ Lab model: 90 turns wound copper wire, d=2.0 mm, on a sparse wooden support, 49x58 cm, constant pitch of 10.0 mm.

¾ Measurements: Input impedence measurements were made using a vector network analyser for 10 KHz to 5 MHz.

¾ PEEC model:90 turns, with 4 bars per turn. Excited with a unitary current source, gives I

in

and V

in

, input impedance Z

in

calculated.

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

10−1 100 101 102

Freq. [MHz]

Input impedance [k ]

PEEC model Measurements Lumped model

Input impedance for rectangular reactor (blue PEEC, green- measurements, red- lumped ).

(8)

Numerical example for circular reactor model

¾ Lab model: 133 turns wound copper wire, d=0.7 mm, on a plastic cylindrical plastic support, d=0.4m, constant pitch of 2.5 mm.

¾ Measurements: Input impedence measurements for 10 KHz to 5 MHz.

¾ PEEC model: 133 turns, with 20 rectangular bars per turn. Excited with a unitary current source, gives I

in

and V

in.

Z

in

calculated.

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

102 103 104 105 106

frequency [MHz]

Input inpedence []

measurement PEEC QS

Input impedance for circular reactor (blue-measurements, red- PEEC model).

(9)

Comment on results

¾ Fairly good agreement in resonance frequencies

¾ Slight mismatch in amplitudes at resonances

¾ Possible explanation :

Î skin-effect and dielectric material NOT modeled

(10)

Conculsions

¾ Good agreement between PEEC model simulations and measurements

= Promising.

¾ Easy to include transmission line (effects), driving circuitry, and measurement equipment.

¾ Can handle circular, rectangular, and any other 3D reactor.

¾ Fast, especially for time domain modeling.

¾ Next steps:

¾ Industry reactor modeling.

¾ Include Skin effect.

¾ Include dielectric material.

¾ Future: Develop the theory and code for PEEC + magnetic materials.

(11)

Thank You for Your attention

Questions?

(12)

Time complexity for 210 turns PEEC model -on regular workstation

Step Time [min] Time [min]

Solver type FD-PEEC TD-PEEC

Parsing & Meshing 0.08 0.08

Calculating partial inductances

0.7 0.7

Calculating coefficients of potentials

6.0 6.0

Solver 1034 (100 frequencies) 15 (1000 time steps)

Total ~ 1040 ~ 22

(13)

PEEC solution (considering only 4 bars per turn)

¾ Assemble system using KVL : AV − (R + jωLp)I = Vs

¾ Enforce continuity equation at each node

jωP-1V − ATI = Is

¾ A is connectivity matrix

¾ Is and Vs are current and voltage sources respectively

Lp22

Lp33

Lp44

P133 Ip

P144 Ip P111 Ip

P122 Ip

-

+

Lp11

-

+

-

+

-

+

VL

VL

VL

VL

1

4

3 2

Ip1

Ip4

Ip3 Ip2

3

2

1

4

I3

I1 I2

I4

f2

f1

f4

f3

References

Related documents

Among the numerical techniques, the partial element equivalent circuit (PEEC) method [1] [2] is well-known and suitable for combined electromagnetic and circuit analysis and has

The Partial Element Equivalent Circuit (PEEC) method is an integral equation based full-wave approach to solve combined circuit and electromagnetic problems in the time and

The PEEC method has recently been extended to use nonorthogonal volume- and surface cells, included Paper D, Nonorthogonal PEEC Formulation for Time- and Frequency-Domain EM and

Electromagnetic Simulations Using the Partial Element Equivalent Circuit (PEEC) Approach..

This paper details recent progress within PEEC based EM modeling including the nonorthogonal formulation and the inclusion of frequency dependent lossy dielectric by the use

EMC Europe 2014 tutorial on Partial Element Equivalent Circuit (PEEC) based analysis of EMC problems..

In this paper, we investigate the time-domain stability of quasi- static PEEC-based EM models from a circuit perspective. We focus on the impact of partial element accuracy on

the wrong application of calculation routines applicable the use of large-aspect-ratio PEEC cells for which certain the use of inadequate numerical integration for