Second
Quarterly
Progress Report
ofBENTONITE SEALING 1hVESTlGATIONS
During
Period ofMay
11960
toAugus
t 11960
by
R DDirmeyer
Jr R W Hansen M M SkinnerPrepared
forII
Ef
fJJJ
Au
G
fo
6
Co
COl
19Cfj
St
r IIArtii
l underSoutheastern Colorado Water
Conservancy
DistrictCSU Research Foundation Sub Fund
1414
and
Colorado Water Conservation Board
under
CSU Research Foundation Sub Fund
1416
Colorado State
University Experiment
StationEngineering
ResearchFort Collins Colorado
August
1960
This
report
summarizes the bentoniteproject
activitiesduring
thepast
three months Thisreport
isprimarily
concerned with those activities in the
Conservancy
District areahowever
informationrelating
to other areas of the State is also included where useful forcomparison
purposesThe
project
activities will be discussed under threeheadings
sampling
ofpotential
clay
or bentonitedeposits
laboratory
evaluation ofclay
or bentionitesamples
evaluation of results obtained in field sediment
sealing
trials withclay
or bentonite materials5AMPLI lID
Bentonite or
clay deposits
within or close to the Districtarea that have been
sampled during
thepast
three months include 1 The Butterfield leases southwest of Las AnimasColorado Nos
S44
l 24
and5
2 The
Stough pit
southwest of Las AnimasColorado
No
S44
3
3
TheWagner
prospect
southwest of Las AnimasColorado No
545
14
The Mummaprospect
near PonchaSprings
Colorado Nos529
148
1 22
5
Deposit
near Westcliffe Colorado No547
16
McAlpin
ranchprospect
near RedWing
Colorado1No
546
lBentonite or
clay deposits
in other areas of Colorado that have beensampled
include1 Brick
clay
prospects
near Marshall Colorado between Golden and Boulder2 Vandleman
prospect
near Fort Collins Colorado No541
13
Wyble
Drumprospect
nearWellington
Colorado No531
1 23
4
Rump pit
near Grand Junction Colorado Nos542
1543
15
5chraderprospect
near FortMorgan
Colorado No536
1 2TE5TlNG
The initial results of
testing
of Coloradoclays
completed
under this program are tabulated in Table I Ingeneral
a
grit
content of less than 10 per cent and a colloidalyield
of more than30
per cent is considered favorable Howeveradditional evaluation tests are needed to
fully
evaluate aclay sample
These additional evaluation tests arebeing
developed
The colloidal
yield
grit
and lime tests are to be run on allsamples brought
to theproject
laboratory
From thesesamples
arepresentative
set of about15
samples
has beenselected for
testing
in addition to the above The detailedtesting
program will include these additional tests permeability
swellability
wetability
stability against
erosionliquid
limitplastic
limitshrinkage
limitspecific
gravity
chemical characteristics totalexchange
capacity
cationexchange
capacity
etc and x ray diffractionanalysis
It is
expected
that the detailedtesting
program when correlated to the field trial results will reveal those teststhat are most
meaningful
from apractical
canal and reservoirsealing viewpoint
FIELD TRIALS
Only
limited field trial activities arebeing
carriedon at this
stage
of theproject
program Theclay
or bentonitesamples
need to be evaluated before trial activities in canals and reservoirs can be initiated on alarge
scaleIn some areas however bentonites with a favorable
past
experience
record are available The Silver Rocker bentoniteLamberg
from Howard is one such bentonite Numerous installations with this bentonite have been made in the Salida
4
Several other bentonite
deposits
haveappeared
sufficiently
favorable to warrant field installations the FoxDilley
pit
near CanonCity
the Resslerpit
near Howard theStough
and the Butterfieldpits
near Las Animas and theRump
pit
near Grand Junction Trial installations with severalother bentonites or
clays
have beenplanned
Detailed water loss measurements before and after the
sealing
treatment arebeing
accomplished
at thefollowing
locations Cottonwood Creek near Buena VistaWellington
Lake inlet ditch nearBailey
ColoradoMyron Tompkins
Ditch nearBuena Vista West
Burlington
Extension Ditch near HudsonColorado
Water loss measurements were collected for the bentonite
installation on the
Troy Relly
Ditch near Buena Vista Theinstallation was made on
May
1960
Sample
Harne Location Grit Cont Co11oid Yd LimeLiq
Plast Plast ShrinkSpec
ColorNo Sieve
Hyd
DecanHyd
Pres Limit L imi t Index Limit Gravtation
S
28
1 FoxDilley
CanonCity
7
56
9
25
29
48
225
yes62
032
9
29
119
26
225
Med grs28
2 FoxDilley
CanonCity
4 52
9
5
30 70
245
Yes55
8
29
4
26
4
24
20 261
Ned grs28
3
FoxDilley
CanonCity
7
82
9
4
29
87
245
No58
6
265
32
118
25
240
Med grs28
4
FoxDilley
Canon City
163
9
05 41
213
1 Yes59
4
26
3
33
115
39
242
Med528
5
FoxDilley
CanonCity
4
87
8
123
63
16
Yes46
7
23
223
5
30
66
248
MedS28 6
Fox D illly CanonCity
3 97
7
85
30 07
165
Yes72
040
131
9
33
76
241
Med gr529
1 Pachek Salida 185
7
55
1907
09
Yes79 8
52
7
27
129
202039
Med gr530
1 White LaGar ita28
65
8
5
2166
09
Yes67
8
47
1 207
34
99
263
PinkS31
1 Drumvlyble
oJellington
176
16
5
57
74
5
25
No67
632
035
6
2133
250
Dk grS31
2 DrU IWyble
Wellington
5
8
6
224
02 04
Yes Nonplastic
material PinkS31
3
Drum1yble
Wellington
269
7
6
36
19
24
No77
7
42
9
34
8
42
0 242
Med grS32
1 Davidson Hartzel8
67
14 5
34
27
28
Yes BrownS33
1 Monroe Livermore 170
8
1561
89
125
No BrownS33
2 Monroe Livermore 256
8
25
68
15
18
No109
8
50
159
7
30
71
264
GreenS34
l Kessler Howard 057
3
65
23
53
05
No PinkS34
2 Kessler Howard 032
4 45
23
75
07
YesPink
S34
3
Kessler Howard25
70
5
015
11 J75
No Ltgr
S34 4
Kessler Howard56
80
145
1132
J25
NoGray
S34 5
Kessler Howard 229
4
9
28
04
105
Yes BrownS34
6 Kessler Howard 182
265
18
20 015
Yes Pink535
1Embry
Pueblo44
95
125
6
98
055
Yes Brow536
1 Schrader FtMorgan
4
107
143
65
275
No9203
47
045
3
2286
269
Lt grS36
2 Schrader FtIIIlJrgan
131
8 6
48
02303
YesLt gr
S36
3
Schrader FtMorgan
1037
8
45
39
73
3
0 No Lt grS37
1 Bi 11ington
Marshall49
71
265
14
69
125
Yes31
8
19
2 126
22033
246
RedS37
2 Bi 11ington
Marshall 17
28
9
53 85
4
55
No Lt grS37 3
Billington
Marsha 115 63
5
215
03
1 20 No BrownS37
4
Billington
Marshall 1246
7
55
28
6 265
Yes Ltgr
S3
5
Bi 11ington
Marshall 139
915
43
7
3
85
No54 4
25
3
29
113
65
267
Med grS3
1 Norton LaPorte 017
9
25
6219
95
Yes Lt grS38
2 Norton LaPorte 138
5
35
46
68
3
45
YesLight
Sample
No539
1539
2540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1544
251
14
3
544 4
544
5
545
1546
1547
1548
1548
2 NameBillington
Bi 11ington
Chapman
5mithRump
Graves Butterfield Butterfield Butterfield Butterfield ButterfieldWagner
McAlpin
Moss Mumma Mumma o TABLE I ContinuedLocation Grit Cant Colloid Yd Lime
Liq
Plast Plast ShrinkSpec
ColorSieve
Hyd
DecanHyd
Pres Limit Limit Index Limit Gravtation Arvada
17
81
Arvada14 34
Center73
68
Ft Collins9
26
Grd Junct 646
Grd Junct4
91
Las Animas5 93
Las Animas4
57
Las Animas7
43
Las Animas 187
Las Animas3 28
Las Animas5 67
Las Animas27
20 Westcliff8
83
Poncha5pgs
149
Poncha5pgs
2l36
5 95 25 42
155
6 939
74
3
45
1 23
26 0 27
35
16
83
175
8
25 39
57
3
35
9 031 92
3
28
4
50 37
4 75
8
35 53 40
4
95
8
05 47
97
4
45
8
40
56
46
4 05
7
9
47
223
2i7
5
52
30
3
05
5
34
65
3
2 24
25
34
0 2 6 132 68
15
4
8
18
37
1
0 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No No No Yes Yes Brown Med br Med Lt 9 Med gr 11ed gr Lt gr Lt gr Brown Med gr Med gr Med gr Med gr White Vled br Dk brAdaitional information on test
samples
will be added to this table as other testsare
developed
and runNote
528
1through 532
1 20 gm used forgrit
all other 10 gmsamples
t
O