• No results found

Analysis of water samples saved during 1935-36 campaign - Longmont factory - the Great Western Sugar Company

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples saved during 1935-36 campaign - Longmont factory - the Great Western Sugar Company"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

ulN'L

c·,L, 11-,(

G. W, S. CO •

YSIS OU WATER

SAMPLES

SAVED

WRING

1Q35

~6 CAMPAIGN

LOWOJIAlNT

"iAC

'l1Q8Y

THE GREAT VtESTERN SUGAR COMP.ANY

Copies

to:

General

superintendent

General Chemist

L---Diatrict

Engineer

superintendent

Chiet

Chem.1st

0

(2)

Index

to

VJater Analz_sia

Kind

of'

W

a 1-r

.

P5e

no.

Boiler

Feed

..

1

Presa flaeh

-

-

2

Batter Supply-

-

-

s

ite Centritugel

Wash

-'

c

ater

in

Boilers -

-

5

City Water

-

-

6

River water

-

-

,,

(3)

----Form 448-lQOQ-8-32-Pads lOQ

WATER ANALYSIS

... L.o.nsin<:m.:t ...

Factory

... f.!..P.:tU. ..

J.O., ...

,

193 ~--·-Kind of Water:

Boiler

Feed

Description of Sample:

Composite sample taken

during campaign

1935-36.

Source of Water: Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

Drip&s from steam

chambers

or

the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th efteeta

ot the

exaporetors, dr1pa from the pan and granulator coils, steam traps

trom all

main

steam

lines, and owcas1only city

water.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100,000

SiO, Silica SiO,

Fe Sodium Chloride NaCl

Ca Sodium Sulphate Na,SO.

Mg Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Na Magnesium Chloride MgCl,

Cl Magnesium Sulphate. MgSO,

so.

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

co,

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Galcium Sulphate CaS0,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

3.00

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO Parts Per 100,000

1.00

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

(1)

·----··--

...

~ ~ i e f

'

(4)

Form US-1000-8-32-Pada 100

WATER ANALYSIS

... Lo~_emq~~·-···--····-

Factory

... 4P~_ti.J:.Q.a ...

,

193.~--··

Kind of Water:

Press

v

:

aah

Description of Sample:

Composite

semple

taken during l93S..36

campaign

Source of Water:

Drips

from 1st end 5th

effects

of the evaporat ore,

drips

from

all

heaters

,

blow-up tr~ps,

carbonation traps, and overflow trorn

boiler feed

tank.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

s

o

.

Carbonic Acid

co,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

5.40

(2)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS. Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na,SO. Sodium Carbonate Na,CO. Magnesium Chloride MgCl, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO. Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaiCl, Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO, Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

Parts Per 100,000

5

.

40

~

-=--...~r.

Chi~fChemist.

(5)

-Form US-1000-8-82-Pada 100

WATER ANALYSIS

...

~Q~~~t

...

Factory

.l?T..U •..

*Q

... ,

t

9~ ....• Kind of Water:

Battery Supply

Description of Sample:

Compoai te sample taken during campaign 1936""36.

Source of Water: Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

Condensed water trom

N

orth

Evapora

tors

(Ci"ty

water

o~

leg}, condensed

water

from

Pliver vacuum

system

(City water on le3),

cooling

w

ater trom

gaa

pumps, drips

from

battm-y

calorizatora and ovffrf'low

t'rom

press

wash

tank.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100,000 Parts Per 100,000

SiO, Silica SiO,

Fe Sodium Chloride NaCl

Ca Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Mg Sodium Carbonate Na,COa

Na Magnesium Chloride MgCl,

Cl Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

so.

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

co,

Calcium Chloride Ca,Cl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

.20

Org'lnic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

____

5._go

_ _

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist

Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

( 3)

~

C ~ i ; i ~ r c h e m i s t .

··----·

..

(6)

----Form U8-1000-8-S2-Pada 100

WATER ANALYSIS

...

Lo~9.~~

...

Factory

...

.

...

J..P.r~J

..

J.9., ...

,

t

93~-

-··

Kind of Water:

White Centritugal wash water.

Description of Sample:

Compoei

te

sample taken during campaign 1935-36

Source of Water:

Dondenaed

water

from 4th

etftect

north,

and

occasionaly trom

3rd and 5th

effects.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid GO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO Parts Per 100,000

2.30

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO.

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaiCl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS

(4}

Parts Per 100,000

2.30

General Supt. General Chemist

Asst. General Supt.

District Engineer

Superintendent Laboratory

~ ~ f-Chemiat.

(7)

Form HS-1000-8-32-Pada 100

WATER ANALYSIS

Lo~ont

...

Factory

...

.

...

A~r.U ..

tQ ...

,

193.~ .. .

Kind of Water:

Boiler Water

Description of Sample:

Composite sample

taken

during

campaign 1935~36.

Source of Water: Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

2545

lbs.

(37.2 lbs. per

day)

ot

soda

ash, and

25 lbs.

(.4

lb.

per

day)

or caustic soda,

were

introduced

into

the

water

line

to the

boilers.

Sample

does not show any

hydrate alkalinity.

F

rom

all boilers

in

senice.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100,000 Parts Per 100,000

SiO,

2.70

Silica SiO,

2o70

Fe

~24

Sodium Chloride NaCl

2.34

Ca

4.32

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

55.07

Mg

.14

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

86.05

Na

56.09

Magnesium Chloride MgCl,

Cl

1.42

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

so.

37.24

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

.49

co,

55.ll

Calcium Chloride Ca1Cl,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO ..

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

10.11

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

.50

157.26

157.26

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

52.94

210 ..

20

I

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

52.94

TOTAL SOLIDS

210.20

COPIES TO General Supt.

General Chemist

Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

(8)

Form 448-1000-8-32-Pada 100

~

WATER ANALYSIS

... L.o.ngmo.n.t.

...

....

.

Factory

....

...

APril ..

10., ...

.

...

, 193

..

6.

..

Kind of Water:

City

\i

ater

Description of Sample:

Comp~site

sample taken during

campaign

1935-36.

Source of Water:

s

t. Vrain

R

iver

about 15

miles

west

ot Lon©nont

.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid CO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 1 0 ~

.23

.06

.36

.11

.34

.05

.04

1.05

-2.24

1.18

3.42

(6)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Parts Per 100,000 Silica SiO,

.2

3

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.oa

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

.06

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

.47

Magnesium Chloride MgCl,

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

.38

Calcium Chloride CaiCL

Galcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

.90

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

.12

---2.24

Organic and Voktile (by difference)

----.!.!18

TOTAL SOLIDS

3.4

_

2

_ _

(9)

-Form US-1000-8-82-Pada 100

WATER ANALYSIS

Lons

t

oont

...

Factory

.,.,_ ... ..

.

... AP.t~t.J9.

... ,

193.~ .. .

Kind of Water: Ri

vor

li

ster

Description of Sample:

COI11po13ite sampl,e taken during

oampaign

19

3

5-36

Source of Water:

St.

V

rain

R

iTer

just

swth

of tactory

site.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

l.10

.::u

15.40

7.68

9.64

l.32

64.11

13.63

113.09

12.61

125.70

I

I

(

7)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO, Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO.

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO, Magnesium Chloride MgCl, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO. Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride Ca,Cl,

C'alcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

1.10

2.18

27.11

38.0l

21.90

22.35

113.09

12.61

125.70

~

~

... . ---

~ -

·

·

··

Chief

Chemist.

References

Related documents

Intervjufrågor till: El-kretsen, Sims recycling solutions Ab, Kuusakoski recycling och Stena recycling. 1) Skulle ni kunna ge en kort beskrivning av er verksamhet samt hur ni

Detta kan vara ett sätt för dem att skapa förtroende hos mottagaren eftersom de på så vis inte upplevs som säljare som försöker tvinga på mottagaren något vilket kan bidra

På så sätt kunde datainsamlingen säkerställa att felaktig information som inte bekräftas från samtliga metoder upptäcktes samt öka förståelsen för introduktionen

In this preliminary work we explored the prediction of musical so- phistication subscales (i.e., emotions and active engagement) from music listening behavior.. Our results show

By investigating the applied diversity on different levels of music characteristics (i.e., artist and genre level), we found that on a general level musically sophisticated users

Since the boundary quantum field theory in this case is defined over a p-adic number field either Q p or its unramified extension Q pn , further development of

In previous works [9,10], the following correspondence between driven two-dimensional conformal field theories and dynamical systems has been established implicitly: Evolution of

Work of Ferwerda, Schedl, and Tkalcic [12, 10] on Instagram pictures, showed that the way filters are applied to create a certain distinctive- ness that can be used to