• No results found

Annual report of county agent work in Colorado, 1921: Boulder County

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Annual report of county agent work in Colorado, 1921: Boulder County"

Copied!
78
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION WORK IN AGRICULTURE

AND HOME ECONOMICS

State Agricultural College of Colorado,

U

.

S

.

Department of

Agriculture and Bouldel' County Cooperating

.

ANNUAL

REPO:.i.T

OF

COUNTY AGENT WORK

December

1, 1920

to November 30, inclusive.

(3)

)

'

ANNUAL REPORT INDEX

Page

Agricultural resources of Boulder County- - - -

1

Status of Farm Bureau Organization,

Outlined program of work, 1920-- - - -

2-5

Organization,

Annual

M

eeting

)

Advisory Council

)

Membership Drive

)- - - -

6~±~

Annual

Pic~ic

)

Boys

&

Girls Clubs)

Crop Improvement, Standardization of varieties)

Better Seed

)- - - 12-19

Soil Improvement

)

Live Stock, Dairy Imppovement)

Other Livestock )- - - 20-24

Home Work,

Care of Children)

Poultry

)-

25

Pest Control,

Prairie Dog District)

Pocket Gopeers

)- - - 26-27

Other Pests

)

Farm Business, Labor Exchanges

)

Exchange Bulletin)

Farm Accounts

) - - - 27-28

Blue Sky Law

)

Cooperative

M

arketing-Agricultural Education in R

u

ral Schools

Summary of Accomplishments, 1921

Suggestions for 1922, 6utlined Program of Work

-Statistical Report Summary----

.

-- 29

30

- 31-32

- 33-36

37

Specimens of Work- - - 38-42

(4)

... -¢1~-w-"'1; ~~!fit."'" ~~~.

~;tl

~

L

'

AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES OF BOULDER COUNTY' 1921.

Boulder County contains

488,960

acres.

Total farm acerage reported

138,244

acres.

Population, about

40,000

Rural po

pulation, about

6,000

Farms,

owners,

702

renters

349

owners

&

r

enters, 32.

Total number farms,

1083

Average size of farm,

127

acres.

Elevation of farm lands from

4690

to

7000

ft.

Few farms up to

10,000

ft.

Principal crops in order of acerage and yaeld.

W

inter wheat,

18,219

acerage

22

yield per acre

Spring wheat

11,286

20

irrigated

Alfalfa

21,517

3i

tons

Corn

9,386

27

Sugar beets

9,234

11 tons

Barley

4,203

25

Oats

3,981

32

Livestock in county.

Horses,

5630

Cattle,

14900

Sheep

500

Hogs,

5000

Purebreds.

Stallions,

25

Mares,

100

.

~ . ~.t-ff

Bulls,

300

. / .

.

r

Cows,

350

.. ·

Boars,

200

"

Sows,

1000

~

Rams ,

20

tf

'

r

Ewes,

7

l

C

yieldlf non

4

irrigated

12

5

8

I

(5)

I f

STATUS OF

FMt~

BUREAU

ORGANIZATION.

The form

of

Farm Bureau organization used in Boulder County was

formulated by Mr. H. H. Simpson along in 1917 when he was County Agent.

It

differs somewhat from any other similar organization that we have

knowledge of.

The form is namely this:

Board of Trustees.

nThe government of the organization shall be vested in a Board of

Trustees, six (6) in number.

At the annual meeting of the association

in 1917 there shall be elected three trustees for a term of one year

and three trustees for a term of two years.

Thereafter three trustees

shall be elected at each annual meeting of the association fGr

~term

of two years."

The Board of Trustees at their first meeting elect &fficers,

President, Vice-President and Secretary-Treasurer.

The

Secretary-Treasurer does not need to be a member of the Board of Trustees.

Advisory eouncil.

The members are made up from appointees from the following

or-ganizations:

Mountain and Plains Farmers Institute

Longmont Farmers Institute

Each subordinate Grange in the County

Each Farmers Union in the County

Commercial Associations of Boulder, Lyons, Longmont,

Lafayette, Louisville.

Other agricultural organizations when organized.

Any

organization having

200

or more members can have one additional

member of the Advisory Council for each 100 members over 200

.

We have found that this form of organization tends to keep all

factions in the county informed of the activities

of

the

Farm

Bureau and

that when called upon to cooperate in various activities they are ready

to do so

.

In the past year we have been putting effort on the organization

of Community Committees, something that had not been done Eefore.

The

chairman

.}f

these committees becomes a member of the Advisory Council.

In this form of

org~~ization,

care is taken to elect members to

the Board of Trustees who can lead various projects in the program of

work, and the sub-projects are taken care of by. members of the Advisory

Council and aided by the committees in the various communi ties.

While it is a rather slow process to bring the Community Committee

plan about on a working basis, in all communities it is gaining ground

and it is not too hopeful to believe that within two years all communities

will be doing effective work along the lines which they choose.

It is believed that to further the Farm Bureau movement and keep

it increasing in value to the county that work by communi ties should be

developed.

It is believed that enthusiasm in the various communities

~ust

be worked up so that when a piece of work is laid out it will be

carried through.

To further this, the present Farm Bureau is planning,

(6)

laid out and the "world's series•• to be played at the County Fair.

Second, to promote community exhibits at the County Fair, together

with 6ommunity Fairs where possible.

This has already been taken

up with the Fair Board and they have allotted premiums as follows:

let, $75.00; 2nd, $50.00; 3rd, $25.00; and $15.00 to all exhibits of

merit not placing.

This has never been done before in this county and we feel that

we

are on the way to a larger interest in Farm Bureau work.

PROGR~4!~

OF WORK.

The following program of work was determined

by

the several

communities holding committee meetings, and suggesting lines of work

to follow.

These suggestions were brought to the Board of Trustees

of the Farm Bureau, char1ged, new suggestions added, the whole

recom-mended for adoption; sent to the Annual

Meeting

and adopted finally.

Four communities gave their opinion through

committees--Broomfield, Valmont, Hygiene and Burlington.

Six other communities

were worked in by individual consultations wi-th different farmers.

Si.x community meetings were held in furthering the pro gram.

The great interest taken in the past in pure seed through the

registration of

fields

of corn, wheat and barley caused this to be the

bigproject in the program of work.

The need for better livestock in the county Cffilsed the breeders to

feel that it was a duty to continue the sales of pure breda even though

the price was very low.

The breaking up of the joint Cow Testing Association which was

between Adams County and Boulder County necessitated the formation of

a

new Cow Testing Association.

The presence of prairie dogs on part of one township caused

the

call for a Prairie Dog Pest District.

The remainder of the program was from suggestions ruainly.

Project

A._~rganization.

F. W.

Wadsworth, Chairman.

Sub-project l.

Farm Bureau

f•iembership

drive.

F.

W.

Wadsworth, chairman.

To start Feb. 7,1921 and end Feb. 21,1921.

To have help from State Farm Bureau.

Goal,

600

members

at $5.00

Sub-project 2.

Annual Picnic. Richard Swnmons, chairman.

To be held in Boulder County, July 1921.

Goal, 2000 present at picnic.

Sub-project 3.

Boye

&

Girls Clubs.

Mrs. Robt. Linton, chairman.

Work for community club building at Roosevelt Park.

(7)

Organize sewing clubs with total of 150 members

Organize canning clubs with total of 35 members

Organize poultry clubs with total of 25 members

Or

g

anize calf clubs with total of 25 members

Organize pi

g

clubs with total of 25 members

Organize sheep clubs with total of 16 members

Orgazlize corn clubs with total of 50 members

Organize cooking clubs with total of

50

members

Find local leaders for all clubs.

Goa

l,

to have a

t

least 90% finish work.

Projec~

B.

Crop .fmprovernent.

Chairman, W.

A. Groom.

Sub-project 1.

Standardization of varieties.

A. D. Holt,chairman.

200

acres registered Marquis

300

acres registered Kanred

100

acres

registered Turkey Red.

250

acres registered Minn. No. 13

Try out other silaga corn in variety tests

Try out sunflowers on Gunbar

r

el hill for silage.

Start the gr-owing of certified potatoes in county

Start the growing of registered Grimm alfalfa seed

Sanry out the contest between Marquis and Defiance wheat.

Corn club with

50

members

Sub-project 2.

Better Seed.

W. W. Robbins, chairman.

Urge testing, cleanin

g

, treating of seed by publicity in

newspapers, Exchange Bulletin, etc.

Conduct a t11ur of fields of

registered

grain to d

·

emonstrate the

use of pure seed.

Plan an exhibit for the County Fair and the Corn Show.

Sub-project 3.

Soil Improvement.

Richard Sammons, chairman.

Get at least 5

f

arrners to start rotation system of crops.

Project C.

Livestock Improvement.

c.

A. Rossiter, chairma.YJ..

Sub-project 1. Dairy Improvement.

Lee Johnston, chairman.

Calf club with 10 members

Build up Cow Testing Associ at ion

Assist Broomfield community to create a purebred Holstein community

Gontest at County Fair.

Sub-project 2.

Other Livestock.

Herbert Howarth; chairman.

Calf club with 15 members

Combination sale third Thursday in February.

Bred sow sale Farmers Congress week at Ft.Collins

Pig clubs with 40 me!lnbers

Sheep clubs with 10 members

Project D. Pest Control.

W. J.

S~ith, Chairma.~.

Sub-project 1. Formation of pest district. W. J. Smith, chairman.

Form pest district on prairie dogs

Form pest district on pocket gophers

Sub-project 2.

Other pests

.

Find method and hold two demonstrations on destruction of crawfish

Find best method and hold two demonstrations on control of

wildcats

Garry on two demonstrations in the eradication of morning glory

Work out control methods of rag weed, fire weed, fan weed.

(8)

P~oject

E.

Farm Business.

C. L. Hover, chairman.

Sub-project l. Labor exchanges.

Rae H. Ki teley, chairman

Cooperate with 6ommercial clubs in conducting exchanges

Sub-project 2.

Exchange Bulletin.

C. L. Hover, chairman

Publish Bulletin each month.

Committee meet once each month and aid editor in getting material.

Sub-project 3.

Farm Accounts.

J. A. Decker,

chairm~.

Hold three farm aecount schools

Urge banks to adopt account books approved by A.F.B.F. and

fur-nish book to farmers.

Sub-project 4.

Blue Sky Law.

W. L. McCaslin, chairman

Project F.

Hqme Work.

Mrs. Rott. Linton, chairman.

Sub-project 1.

Care of children.

5 schools in feeding children

Hot lunches in schools

Sub-project 2.

Poultry. E.

J. Schweiger, chairman

Hold 10 culling demonstrations

Sale of pens of chickens

in

combination sale

Poultry clubs with 25 members

Sub-ppoject 3. Girls clubs. Mrs. Robt. Linton, chairman

Sewing clubs

with

150 members

Canning clubs with 25 members

Cooking clubs with 25 members

Project G.

Cooperative Marketing.

Sam Thomas, chairman.

Assist the livestock shipping associations

Arrange for sale of club stock at Fair time

Arrange for sale of

registered

seed

Advertise registered seed by sending lists of growers to other

County Agents

Arrange for exhibit of registered seed at County

&

State Fairs.

Project H.

Agricultur~~ducation

in

Rural Schools.

F.S. Luethi,chairman

Get course in farm accounts on accredited and required course

for 8th grade

(9)

ORGANIZATION.

Leader

t

Frank Wadsworth.

Community Organization.

With a member of the Board of Trustees, the County Agent went into

each of the three communities organized, Broomfield, Valmont and Burlington.

First a visit was made to the leading farms and the work discussed with

the leading farmers.

Their suggestions were taken and they were asked

to name other farmers who might be the proper men to be asked to a

Community Committee meeting.

A date and place were set for a meeting.

The other men were then visited and invited to attend the meeting.

Because of this method being new to this county and the time

limited since the Agent came in the county in July, and a program of

work to follow, only the three communities were visited in this way.

It was thought a better plan to start slow and build strong·.

In the Hygiene community, the fourth community to do work this

year, a different

pla~ was tried.

Mr. W.

J. Smith, who owna a large

acerage of land in this community was

particu~arly

interested in the

eradication of prairie dogs.

He was appointed a committee of one to

select the other men and call a .meeting.

He did so, and six were

present.

At the meeting, a committee on Prairie Dog Pest District

and one on Farm Accounts were appointed.

It was found that the right

man had been secured for the Pest District.

The best work of any

community was carried on in this project in this community.

Plans for the adoption of the Program of Work by the Advisory

Council before the Annual Meeting were not carried out because of a

misunderstanding in calling the meeting, so the program was brought up

at the Annual Meeting Dec. 10, 19 20

im

the

f

o rrn suggested by the County

Agent after consultation with the Board of Trustees.

The Advisory

Council meeting was then called for Feb. 5, 1921 at which 32 members

were present.

Tee program of work was adopted as a whole at this

meeting.

Annual Meeting.

Dec. 10, 1921, District Court Room, Boulder, Colo.

200 present.

Largest annual meeting of the Boulder County Farm Bureau ever held.

The Corn Show was held in connection with the meeting.

Each project leader gave a report of his project.

The Farm Bureau Constitution was amended, fixing the annual dues

at $5.00 per year instead of

$2.00

.

Members were solicited at this

meeting and 33 new members at $5.00 were paid up.

J. H. Golden, Sam Thomas and C. A. Rossiter were nominated and

elected to the Board of Trustees.

Board of Trustees Meetings.

(10)

The members of the Board of Trustees are: J. H. Golden

Sam

Thomas

C.

L.

Hover

C. A.

R

c

ssiter

Fr

a.nk VV

ad swo rth

W. A.

Groom.

At the first meeting, officers were elected as follows: President,

J. H. Golden;

Vice-President,

Sam

Thomaa; Secretary-Treasurer, Harry

Niven

.

It has been a pleasure to work with the Board of Trustees.

Never

has there been

a

meeting where more than one was absent

and

all were

present at nearly every meeting, even when as high as two meetings were

called during one week.

T~e

Board members are progressive and yet

careful, making one feel that any proposition submitted would receive

carefuland thoughtful consideration.

The work of the Board has been

fine and it would be hard

to

suggest where they could increase their

service to the county through increased effort.

It was unfortunate that Mr. Hover

had

to be away indefinitely

during the year, but we were very fortunate in having the services of

Mr.

Luethi

to take his place.

Advisory Council.

Four meetings were held during the year with 60 present at these

meetings.

On Feb.

5, 1921

the first meeting was called and

32

responded

which was the largest Advisory Council meeting held

to

date.

They

took

up the

program

of

work

in detail

and

finally adopted

it

as

a

whole.

The last m

e

eting was held

Oct

.

22, 1921

with

26 present.

meeting

was

adjourned until the 26th because

of the

large amount

business to transact.

The princip

s

l

l:Jusiness

was

the reports

Club Agent and the County Agent, the

new

Prograrn of Work and the

Meeting and Corn Show.

This

of

of County

Annual

After considerable discussion and some changes, the new program

was adopted as a whole and turned over to be passed on by the Annual

meeting.

Committees on Corn Show and Annual

Meetigg

were appointed.

The

Annual Meeting

is

set for Dec. 17, 1921.

Proiect Leaders Meeting.

One meeting

was held

March

l?,

1921.

Those present

w

ere Mrs.

Robt.

Linton,

Mr. E. J. Schweiger,

Mr.

F. S. Luethi,

.l'ilr.

w.

A. Groom,

Mr. Lee Johnston,

Mr.

w.

W. Robbi

n

s,Mr. C.

L.

Hover,

M

r. C. A. Rossiter,

Mr. J. H. Golden,

M

r. Sam Thomas,

Miss

Em.'na Full, County Club Leader

and

the

County Agent.

Each

project leader g

StVe his

views

o

f methods to use and what he

expected to accomplish this year.

The real sugges

t

ion that should bring

results

'N

as given by C. L. Hover.

It wasthat each Project .ueader should

write out

what

he expect

e

d to do in his work and have it :ready for the

Bulletin.

This was carried outin part.

(11)

SUB-PROJECT I.

M~~BERSHIP

DRIVE.

Frank Wadsworth, Leader.

Total

13 5 paid up members.

Raised dues from

·$

2. 00 to $5.00 per year.

This drive was set to start Feb. 7,

1921

and to end Feb.

21, 1921.

Mr. J. M. Rogers, state organizer, carne

in

the county to help.

Six

meetings were called and he gave very able talks at each.

These

were

held at Longmont, Pleasant View, Broomfield, Hygiene and Valmont. ABout

540 people heard himat these meetings.

Mr. C. L. Hover spoke at one meeting at Niwot with 50 present.

Mr. F. S.Luethi spoke at one meeting at South Boulder Grange with 3 5 present.

A total of about 600 persons

hea~d

these talks and all seemed

enthusiastic.

But when it carne to paying the f

i

ve dollars, they did not

respond

so ree.dily.

H

o

wever, in the communities where personal work

was done by the solici to

t

•s calling on the farmers, 80 to 85% joined.

Evidently it resolved itself into personal work and some

o

ne

to

push the

local solicitor.

Men to look after the drive were appointed in every community.

A

list of prospects were furnished each man.

The County Agent spent days

with the solicitors in two communities.

80

~~

of the farmers seen joined.

The County Club Leader helped in two communities and 551c joined.

One

ot

twe

of the solicitors in the other

coa~ittees went out, but did not

push very hard.

The result was that the drivedid not go big.

Recomme11dation would be to place either a state or national

or-g~~izer

in ch

E

rge and make it possible for him to cover the county.

It

seems to require presonal work and neec$s

someone

to push all the time,

especial

l

y now that money is not plentiful.

Our goal

was

600 members.

Reached

13 5.

SUB-PROJECT

2.

ANNUAL PICNIC.

Richard Sammons, Leader.

Goal, 2000 present.

FT

his picnic is an annual 9.ffair always held in conjunction with

the F atmers Union and Granges of the county.

The joint committee was: Rudolph Johnson, Grange

Emil Affolter, Farmers Union

Ch as. Ziegler, F ar

r

ners Uni

o

n

Richard Sammons, Farm Bureau

Frank

~vadsworth,

Farm Bureau

H. S. Prince, Grange

Philip Haass, Grange

Bert Fel th arn, Farmers Union.

(12)

pay all expenses for the picnic.

They sold the concessions for $150

and

uurned

the amount over to the committee.

A good time was planned

at Meadow Park with baseball, jitney dance, orchestra, speakers and

horseshoe contests.

Things were going fine when about 3:00 p.m. a cloud burtt occured

\

spoiling the fun.

The concessionaires went

in

the hole some, but it

was made up to

them

by the three

orga~izations.

The picnic is one

of the

biggest undertakings of the county by

way of making a show and the only change

that

could be suggested is that

we turn it into more of an educational affair by having judging contest,etc.

(13)

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB PROJECT

Mrs. Robt. Linton, Leader.

Of course the different clubs come under their respective projects

but the whole of Club Work is sum

m

arized here to give it desired prominence.

We have been exceedingly unfortunate in holding Club Leaders.

We

made it a special project this year to secure a Club Leader, but

i i

took

three before

we

were fortunate enough to

seep

one.

Miss Emma Full,

\Vho

was the f'i rst one, was secured Jan. 2 2 , 19

21.

Great credit must be given her for the able

way

she started all of the

club work.

We were indeed unfortunate when she became ill and had to

leave June l, 1921.

We will al

,;

ays

remember

Miss Full as a congenial

worker and a might

'\

fine woman.

We were fortunate in securing Miss Jane Snow to take the place until

we could secure a permanent Club Leader.

She did splendid work until

we secured Mrs. Josephine Lee Ferguson, the present Club Leader.

··

Owing to the many leaders and rush of work, Mrs. Ferguson found

club work in some

·

Nhat of a chaotic condition, but it was pulled out and

straightened up until we have a very creditable showing.

Goal: to organize

enrolled

finished

Sewing clubs,

150 members

94

49

Canning

35

14

14

Poultry

25

20

20

Calf

25

14

14

Pig

26

49

49

Sheep

10

1

1

Corn

50

37

37

CoQJking

50

114

112

370

343

296

Goal: to finish 90%.

Finished

861o.

A great deal of time was spent by the County Agent in training

poultry

tea~s

and stock judging teams.

Club members exhibited 25 pigs, 13 calves and 16 pens of

ch~ckens

J

at the County Fair.

~

The county was well represented in the winnings at the State Fair.

Notwithstanding the fact that one of our best boys was taken off of

the

team the last minute bee 3USe of breaking camp rules and we had to

sub-stitute a boy who had had no previous work, we placed third in the state

for judging team and had high boy.

The team was composed of Agned

Liddl@, Bernard

B~ster,

Wadsworth Viney.

Bernard Buster was high

boy for the state.

The poultry demonstration team, which was trained almost entirely

byC. A. Graves, the local leader at Broomfield, was dec

l

ared ch

-

mpion

of the state.

(14)

Poultry, champions

Stock judging, 3rd place, high boy

c~~ning,

no place

Sewing , third

Corn,

champion

boy

of state.

Through the efforts of the Club Agent and County Agent, the County

Commissioners put up

$100

.00

for the transportation of Club

boys

and

g

irls and club stock to the State Fair.

21 boys and girls were taken.

Two pigs, one cow and calf and one heifer were taken.

One pig placedthird in club work.

The Heifer placed first in

first year club work and second in open class.

The cow and calf placed

first in third year work and third in open class.

Community

Cl~b

Building at Fair Grounds.

The Fair Associaion had $500.00 surplus and through the effort

og

the Farm Bureau they were nearly in the notion of starting the new

Club Building, but at 1 ast other repairs were needed and we failed.

This building is badly needed, especially for boys and girls

club demonstrations.

We

'

are still after

it.

(15)

CROP IMPROVEMENT

Leader, W. A. Groom.

SUB-PROJECT I.

STA~D~RDIZATION

OF VAHIETIES

Leader,

A. D.

Holt.

Under this project probab

l

y more work has been done

by

the

committee in charge than any other project.

At least one of the

corn-mit tee

on

registration

of

fields has visited with the

County

Agent

every field.

The committee on registration is

A. D.

Holt,

A.

C. Maxson,

Sanford Buster, VI.

A.

Groom.

Mr. Holt and Mr. Maxson have given

the most time to the work.

Crops worked on

Goal

Result

Marquis wheat

200

A.

225

A.

14 growers

Turkey

Red wheat,

100

A.

none, because Kanred is

a

Turkey

Kanred wheat

300

A.

750

A.

21 growers

Minn. No. 13 corn

250

A.

3

50.

w.

59 growers

~ew

varieties of corn were registered this year for the first

time.

J.

E. Manchester has developed a distinct type of yellow dent

in

the

last eight years.

It has been grown enough

in

the county to

demonstrate its

·.vo

rth,

so the committee decided to start

it

out from

the supply of seed this year as Boulder County Yello•N Dent.

Eight acres

were registered.

The other variety is a strain of Silver Mine which has been

selected

for early maturity and size of ear for the last nine years

by

C. H. Dixon

of Cory, Colo., Delta County, at 6000 ft. elevation.

It was thought

that it might be a good ensilage corn for the county, so W.

J.

Smith

was prevaileri on to purchase some and plant it.

The corn did so well

in

the 10·

acres which he planted and matured so that ears from the field

tested 100% germination.

However, this was a very favorable year for

the corn.

Mr. Smith is saving it for seed.

The

co~~ittoe

decided that

in

order

to watch it more closely

~~d

to keep it pure should

it

provehit.A.

~

beneficial, it should be registered.

We called

i t

Boulder County

W~

The growers of registered seed are:

Minnesota No. 13 corn.

C. A. Rossiter,

16

acres

Eugene Crosson

2

August Borgmann 20

A. H. Borgmann

7

Rudolph Brand

1

Clifford Brand

1

Robert Brand

l

R. S. Haney

18

S. D. Buster

10

Bernard Buster, 1

V. R. Pennock,

3

Burt Hart,

6

Guy Hart,

6

G. W. S. Co.

3

W. R. Reynolds,

16

C. R. Spencer

~t

Everett Harmon,

10

Clare Hoover,

8

w.

E. Pilcher,

2

Durward Pilcher, 1

Jerome DeBacker, 10

Arthur DeBacker, 10

Edmund Darby ,

1

Leslie Madison,

2

Chas. Kelsey,

2

Glenn Laybourne,

1

Amos Taylor,

1

Evald Anderson,

1

(16)

Carol Bashor,

1

acre

Elbert Reeves,

Merrill Linton,

1

John Reeves,

Jere Leggett,

4:

Howard

Reeves,

Glenn Leggett,

1

Harold Bogren,

Ralph Mosher,

2

Evan Gould,

Harold Ewing,

1

Herbert Osthoff,

Ralph Bixler,

1

R. A. Dove,

Frank Bixler,

7

King White,

Adelaide Kozisek,l

Mr. Skavdahill.,

Arthur Rossiter,

1

Wm.

Nelson,

P.

c.

Molholm,

1

Sam

Thomas,

Vern Molholm,

l

Herbert

.

Osthoff,

Marcella Koziaek,1

Dan Burch,

W. J.

Smith,

J.

E.

Manchester,

:Soulder.

l

County Whi

~-10

acres.

Boulder County Yellow Dent.

8

acres

1

acr~

1

1

1

1

1

8

1

3

6

5

1

6

C. L. Hover,

Steve Bishop,

J.M. Wisecup,

Frank Wadsworth,

W.

w

.

Kiteley,

\~alter

Carmean,

Marouis Wheat

18

acres

H.

J.

Hale,

Sam Karsh

&

Wm.

Hanson,

Gao. Abbott,

Frank Pughe,

Robt. Linton,

14

acres

16

acres

41-}

15

6

22

Son,l9

24

15

28

6t

Wisconsin Pedigreed Barley

Burt Hart,

6

acres

Sam Karsh

&

Son, 10

acres

Kanred Wheat

A.

H. Borgmann,

112

acres

Robt. Linton,

14

w.

J.

Smith

105

o.

c.

Harris,

4

v.

R.

Pennock,

26

P.

c.

Molholm,

25

c.

B. Webb,

21

M

.

Thompson,

2t

J.

A.

Matlack,

5

J.

H.

Golden,

5

Vl

alter lVarl son,

18

Thos. Beasley,

25

Steve Bishop,

16

Frank Smith,

38

A. D. Poor,

15t

Arthur Turner,

68

o.

M. Strombers,

4

Frank Pughe,

9t

Burt Hart,

30

w.

E.

Cushman,

11~~

J.

H.

Butterworth,

Sunflower~

for

Ensilage.

14

Several of the farmers on Gunbarrel Hill have silos.

This is

all dry land.

It wasthought if a crop could be found that

would

give

a greater tonnage than corn

unde~

dry land conditions, that it would

be acceptable.

Mr. John Hartnagle planted six pounds of seed.

It was planted

considerably

thinner

than the corn, but the tonnage was very noticeably

heavier on the ground.

Mr. Hartnagle did not weight the sunflowers

or corn, but he complained of the weight while filling the silo.

He

mixed the sunflowers with corn and is feeding it out now.

Some of the

sunflowers were

15

feet high.

If he gets satisfactory results with

(17)

feeding, he will try them on a larser scale next year.

Other Ensilage Corns in Variety Tests.

Reids Yellow Dent

Northwestern Dent

Wisconsin No.

7

Wisconsin No.

8

Silver King

These varieties were all given a trial,but none of them have proved

the ensilage corn for this county that the Boulder County White promises

mainly because of maturity.

Certified Seed Potatoes.

The lack of marketable crops in the mountain sections of Boulder

County brought the call for a try at seed potatoes.

No better potatoes

can

be grown than in the mountain sections and where care has been taken

with the soil, good clean seed can be grown.

700

pounds of certified

Pearl potatoes were purchased by the

Farm

Bureau and sold to five

growers in the hills near Boulder.

The growers were, Oda Yates, 100 lbs.

E. W. B

ae

k

s ,

10 l b

s.

/~

A. L.. Yo

key

,

50 1 b s.

Chas. Hartman, 100 lbs.

Chas. Craig, 100 lbs.

mt was found when these potatoes were dug that they did not

conform to the type of Pearls at all.

A

sample was taken to the College

and Dr. Sandsten said

th~

there were several types present, but the

nearest he could say would be that they were Downings.

We will try

to have taem certified next year as Downings.

They were good, clean

seed.

Vve preferred Pearl potatoes for the mountain section so that we

might work up a seed rr«ket for the Greeley section.

Downings are grown

to some extent.

Dr. Robbins, head of the seed project and Guy Miller, County

Commissioner, helped to line up the project.

Several of the fanners on the plains section of the county tried

certified seed.

0. C. Harris, 500

Anton Koppef 100

J.

H. Golden, 100

100

25

Robt. Linton, 100

Paul Richardson,

Emil Affolter,

lbs. Cobblers

l bs. Early Ohio

lbs. Green Mountain

lbs. Pearls

lbs. Bliss Triumph

lbs. Pearls, also tried Green Mt.

Early Ohio, Green Mountain

Green Mountains

Where the number of pounds is not given, the grower was trying his

own seed.

All of these fields were inspected by Mr. C. M. Tompkins, Horticulture

(18)

was a very favorable year for the development of dase

ase,

especially

Rhizoatonia.

All potatoes were badly infected.

It is very doubtful

if we will ever be able to grow certified seed on the plains section.

The ground is saturated with disease.

Part of these plots were

plant-ed on ground that had never been in potatoes before so far as anyone

knew, yet they were diseased.

It is very probable that we will have to depend on the mountain

section :Oor our seed

potatoes.

However, the value of good, clean seed

has been demonstrated to these growers and Mr. Harris,

who

grew the

Cobblers, has ordered all certified 0obbler seed for next year.

Altogether about 4000 lbs. of certified seed potatoes were brought

into the county through the Farm Bureau.

Registeted Grimm Al(alfa Seed.

Two farmers asked about the growing of certified Grimm seed.

It

was suggested that if they

were

in

a

section where no other variety but

the certified Grimm alfalfa was grown that it would be possible.

Mr.

E. L. Buster shipped in 100 lbs. of seed.

However, it was decided that

it would be impossible to register it as pure.

Marquis

and

Defia~ce

Contest •

.

This contest of production has been going the last five years in

the county.

Defiance

has

given the largest average return per acre.

Last year the rust hit the wheat just between the time the Marquis was

cut and when the Defiance was ripening.

It cut the yield and quality

of Defiance so hard that very little of it was sown this year, hence we

could not continue the contest.

Corn Club Worli.

Sanford

D.

Buster,Jr., won the championship of Colorado for Corn

Club work.

He

took grand championship for 10 ear

s~nples

over all corn

and grand championship crate over all corn.

This was shown at the

State Corn Show, 1921.

He grew Minnesota No. 13.

SUB-PROJECT 2.

BETTER SEED.

Leader, W. W. Robbins.

The crunpaign for treating, cleaning and test

i

ng seed was carried

on through publicity in the county newspapers, Farmers Exchange Bulletin,

and talks.

Nine articles and three talks were given on this work.

One

new cleaning mill was purchased and the man who grew 100 acres of

reg-istered Kanred cleaned it all at his farm.

Exhibits.

Exhibits were a part

0f

the

better

seed

c~~paign.

There were 196

entries at the County Corn Show,

which

was

the largest Corn Show to date

that the county has held.

There was a large display of registered

Minnesota No. 13 corn at the State Corn Show.

The result was the sale of

seed corn to Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, Whoming, Utah, New

Mexieo

and all

(19)

parts of Colorado.

Three exhibits were shown at the County Fair.

A si~

foot sample

from a representative row from all registered Kanred and Marquis and

barley fields together with a large poster giving the names of growers

ru1d acerage per grower

was

shown.

· .

37

.

fields in allwere represented.

Ten stalks of ensilage corn from each of five varieties with the corn

peeled back to show the comparitive maturity, were shown.

The varieties

whown were, Reids Yellow Dent,

Boulder County White, Boulder County

Yellow Dent,

Minn.

No. 13 and IowalSilver

King.

Samples of all the

fivefields of certified

po~atoes

from the mountain section were

sho~1.

Registered Field Tour.

Beaauae of lack of time this tour was called off.

Ear to Row Test.

Arthur Rossiter, a Corn Club boy, consented to try an ear to row

test of Minnesota No. 13.

Ears were taken from the champion 20 ear

exhibit

sho~1

by

the County Agent at the State Corn Show and champion

ears from the County Corn Show.

42 ears were planted.

The same planter was used for all rows.

The plot was planted in

the center of a 20 acre corn field.

The smallest ear was planted as

far as it would go, 275 feet.

The other rows were planted 275 feet, then

the remainder discarded.

A flood washee through the plot when the corn was six inches high

but it survived and a

per~ect

stand was recorded.

It was very interesting to note the differences in the rows.

One

row matured 2 weeks ahead of the rest.

Some rows were heavy forage

producers, some light, some had ears erect, some drooping, some long

shanks, some short.

Some wows were affected badly with smut and others

right beside would not be affected.

No

partiiular record

was

kept of

these facts.

The plot was started to

J~how

the

differenc~.J:..r.L_:Q_r,JQ...uoing

power of

The ears were planted promiscuously without regard to weight

or anything, as the numbers of the ears will show.

The corn was cut with a binder and taken to the barn where it was

husked and weighed separately.

Such a difference was noticed in the

production of the different rows that the cause was looked for.

Rows

run from

100

lbs. to 200 lbs. in corn produced.

A record of each ear

was kept as to length, circumference, depth of

kernel,

straightness of

row, wedge kernel or not, smooth or rough kernel, color of corn, color

of cob, size of cob, waight of ear, number of rows, whetrier filled out

at tip and butt, tapered ears or not.

Following is the table showing the most noticeable differences

in production and what appears to be the cause.

It will be noticed

that the rows were growl'l in all parts of the plot; thgt length varies

but

litt~e;

that most of the ears are

16

rowed

and that very little

difference in production caused by rough or smooth ears.

Evidently

none of these factors made much difference.

But when the weight of

ears was taken into consideration, the results were interesting and

should cause room for thought.

(20)

1

The ten ounce ears averaged 153 lbs. per row; the eight ounce

ears averaged 142 lbs.

This difference was not caused by more corn

being planted, but evidently the producing power of the 10 oz. ear was

the greatest.

!he 11 oz. ear seems to fall back again in producing

power, though there were only a few of them in the plot.

No. of ear Length of

No. of rows

Weight of ear Rough or

Yield per

ear

smooth

row

10

7t

in.

16

8 oz.

rough

113

41

8

16

8

smooth

121

24

8

18

8

slightly

rough

100

22

8

16

8

smooth

152

36

8

20

8

smooth

143

37

8-f

16

8

rough

163

23

7..1.

16

8

smooth

150

6

7!

16

8

smooth

16'1

46

7-f

16

8

smooth

140

26

6.1.

16

8

smooth

121

14

7t

16

8

smooth

161

45

7-~

16

8

smooth

155

44

q*

16

8

smooth

161

19

8

16

8

smooth

146

Average length, 7.7 in.

Average weight, 142 lbs.

38

9t

16

10

smooth

150

8

at

16

10

smooth

166

9

7t

16

10

rough

1L~5

7

8

16

10

smooth

115

31

7-f

16

10

smooth

145

16

8-~

16

10

rough

162

20

8

1

6

10

rough

200

42

at

16

10

rough

121

32

7J

16

10

rough

174

Average length, 8.1

Average weight, 153 1bs.

39

7-i.

2

18

7

smooth

174

40

at

16

7

smooth

151

13

7-~

18

7

rough

132

18

8

18

7

smooth

161

25

a

16

7

smooth

141

47

16

7

smooth

122

21

7f

16

7

smooth

142

35

~t

18

6

smooth

156

43

16

6

smooth

115

Average length, 7

7/9

Average weight, 144 lbs.

33

7-~

16

9

smooth

100

17

8

16

9

smooth

161

28

7-!

16

9

rough

161

12

7-!

16

8

rough

183

29

7i

16

9

smooth

153

30

8f

16

9

smooth

133

Average length, 7 5/6

Average weight, 148! lbs ..

5

8

16

11

smooth

146

27

8

16

11

smooth

144

15

7-f

16

11

rough

141

(21)

SUB-PRbJECT 3.

SOIL

I~WROVEMENT.

Leader, Richard Sammons.

Goal, 5 farms to start rotation system of crops.

Four farmers were found who wished to statt rotation on their

farms.

They are:

·Mr.

Mack, Boulder

C.

J.

Mather, Longmont

C. Emery, Longmont

Paul Hummel, Boulder

These

f~ms

will be surveyed

this

winter when the owners have time

to help and new rotations worked

o~t.

Field Competition, 5 Acres

Q..~~

The matter of getting prizes put up for field coq.1petition

>.'!as

taken

up with the County Fair Board.

The sugar factory gave $60.00 for the best

field of beets.

Empson Packing Co. gave a silver cup for the best

field of wheat on pea ground ru1d a silver cup for the best field of beets

on pea ground.

Peas are the canning factory's best crop, and peas are

also a soil builder, so this was right along the lines of soil improvement

on a field basis.

The judging of the wheat fields was left to a committee, W. W. Robbins.

The fields were judged on the following basis:

1. General appearance of field.

Purity as to variety,

20 points

Uniformity of stand,

5

••

Freenes

from weeds

&

disease, 15 points

2. Grain, must show one-half bu. srunple at Fair.

Yield per acre( threshing machine measure) 30 points

Grade, U. S. standard,

___!Q..

points

Total, 100 points.

The judging of grain was done by Alvin Kezar.

31

fields of wheat were judged.

the County Fair.

16 fields were represented at

The judging of beet fields was left to a committee from

-

the Sugar

Co. Experimental Station, A.

a.

Maxson, chief of Experimental Dept. Longmont

H. Scilley, Agr. Supt. Loveland factory

E. C. Houston, Agr. Supt. Brighton factory

To be judged on this basis:

1. Uniformity of field, i.e. thrifty condition of plants, stand

general appearru1ce, freeness from weeds.

Stand of beets,

12 inches being 100%,

50 points

2. Weight,

20 points

3. Sugar content,

20 points

4. Shape

10

pointe.

Any lack of uniformity owing to different soil conditions beyond

control of grower left

~a

judges to determine.

Sample of five beets to be selected and brought to the Fair by the

(22)

Best field, $30.00

8~cond,

20.00

Third,

10.00

The greatest enthusiasm was shown in the competition when money

prizes were given rather than silver cups.

21 fields of beets were entered for Sugar Co. prizes.

16 fields of beets after peas for Empson Canning Co. prizes

18 fields

~'presented

at Fair for Sugar Go. prizes

8 fields represented at Fair for Empson Co. prizes.

(23)

LIVESTOCK.

Leader, C. A. Rossiter.

SUB-PROJECT I.

DAIRY IMPROVEMENT

Leader, Lee Johnston.

Work.

Goal,

10

members.

Result,

7

members.

Although

we

did not reach the goal in number of members in the

Dairy Calf Club, a great deal of time and effort was given by Mr.

Johnston in stock judging tours and training the judging team.

Three

judging tours were taken.

The result

was

that the judging team

took third at the State Fair

and

high boy for state.

Dick Jay,

Mr. Freeman, Mrs. Linton and several others he.ll.pp.eedd

~

.

·

the County Club Leader andCounty Agent on these tours.

~

·

The schedule for the two day

~udging

tour was asfollows:

Monday, August

9.

9

a.m.

10:30.

1:30.

3:00.

4:30,

Tuesday, !ugust

10.

Howard Bros. Guernseys

Eston Buster, Holsteins, Shorthorns, Durocs

C.

J. Mather, Polands

W. A. Dickens, Shorthorns

Burt Hart,

Durocs

9 a.m.

E.

J. Maris,

Jerseys

10:30.

A. D. McGillvray, Polands

1:30.

A. E. Anderson,

Herefords

4:

30.

Jay

&

Allan,

Shorthorns

This schedule was kept to the minute and 18 boys and girls attended

on Monday and 17 on Tuesday.

The breeders all had their classes fixed

when we arrived and they all gave the beat assistance possible.

Cow Testing Association.

The old Cow Testing Association called the Boulder, Platte and

St.Vrain Valleys Cow Testing Assn. was partly

in

Adams County.

The

Adams County people decided to form an association of their own, so

it

necesiitated the

fu~ming

of a new association.

Mr. Ball, field man for the State Dairy Commission, did a great

deal of efficient work in helping to organize the new association. Mr.

L. L. Simpson, the tester, quit so we were forced to find a new man.

Mr. Gail McLain was secured.

Through continuous effort for one month, the new association was

started with 19 herds and 219 cows.

It was made possible because the

College guaaanteed the tester

official~·.testing

work while he was off

duty in the county, and by donations from the banks and creameries.

These donations were as follows:

(24)

Longmont Farmers National Bank,

Longmont National Bank,

American National Bank,

Colorado State Bank,

Quality Creamery,

Gilt Edge Creamery,

N

iwot

Sad!e

Bank,

Five Boulder bar1ks, total

$50.00

25.00

20.00

10.00

10.00

20.00

10.00

50.00

$

195.00

Following are the herds in the association:

Gabe Lucas,

12 cows

Sanford

&

Eston Buster,

12 cows

Mat Wencel,

12 cows

John Weng

,

12 cows

Howard Bros.

20 cows

Robt. Nelson,

20

"

Elmer Geer,

15

"

W. E. Arbuthnot, 12

"

J.

D.

Steele,

12 "

N.

Anderson,

12

u

E.

J. Maris,

12

n

Marcus Harper,

.

15

u

C. A. Rossiter

&

F. R. Chapman,

12 cows

Geo. Yeager,

12 cows

F.

A.

Barhite,

20

u

C.

E.

Broleen,

12

"

Harry Yeager,

12

"

Willard Forsyth,

12

"

J. Kalberer

L~-·

15

u

Herds, 19

Total 265 cows

We have several new herds on the string

and

Mr. McLain is working

very hard to increase the number of cows and herds.

We do not

antici-pate any trouble next year in keeping the association going.

Th

e

officers of the association are: Harry Yeager, president;

Marcus Harper, Vice-President;

E;

J. Maris, Trustee;

Lee Johnston,

Trustee;

Walter McCaslin, Secretary-Treasurer.

We have planned to hold

quarterly

meetingsof the association

mem

b

ers to analyze testing records, feeding records, etc.

The first

meeting is Dec. 3,1921.

Amoving picture will be shown,

''Out of

the Shadows

...

~mfield

Community.

The people of this community

w

ish to make it a dairy community.

An

attempt was made to ship in a carlo a:l

of

Holstein

~alves,

but it

fell through at the last minute.

Further efforts will be put toward

this end.

Milking Contest at Fair.

A milking contest for the Fair was lined up, but owing to sickness

in the cows entered, it had to be called off. We

aave

$75.00 in prizes

laid up for next year's contest.

(25)

An

exhibit showing the increase in the production of the cows

on test since they have been in the Cow Testing Association was shown

in the Auditorium at the Fair.

Six high producing purebred Holsteins have just been brought into

the county by breeders.

SUB-PROJECT

2.

OTrmR

LIVESTOCK.

Leader, Herbert Howarth.

Goal: Calf club with

15

members.

Pig club with

25

members

Sheep club with

10

members,

Bred Sow Sale.

Dec.

2, 1920,

Ft.Collins, Colo.

Result:

6

members

49

members

1

member

Baulder County,

16

hogs;

$

Polands,

7

Durocs.

Polands averaged

$72.00;

Durocs,

$58.00

Combination Sale.

Feb.

17, 1921,

Longmont, Colo.

61

entries.

Average about same as year before.

Very good for hard times.

These sales are conducted through the Breeders Associations

of

Larimer and Boulder coumties.

The breeders feel that it is the best

way to spread the doctrine of purebreds, aswell as

the

pur

·

ebre:ds themsel.vea.

They have lost money on one or two sales, but continue to go

ahe~d.

A

new feature was added this year to the Combination Sale. Pens

of purebred chickens, six pullets and one cockerel, were sols.

These

pens sold readily at a satisfactory figure.

Another feature

of the Combination Sale was the list of breeders

who had males or pure seed for sale, printed on hand bills and distributed

at the sale.

This feature alone resulted in several saies of male stock.

Shorthorn Tour.

Through the help of Mr. Bascom, County Agent of Larimer County,

a

committee

was

c a4,led together to arrange

a.

Shorthorn Tour of the two counties.

The committee was: Gao.

E.

Morton

Geo. Sittler

D.

C.

Bascom

D. A.

Jay,

The schedule

9

a.m.

9:30

F.

D. Yeager.

A:ugust 31, 1921.

Jay

&

All

an,

Boulder

References

Related documents

Fiore(2000) hävdar att Internet inte är tillräckligt som marknadsföringskanal för att hålla in- tresset uppe bland kunder, utan man måste kunna nå ut genom flera digitala medium som

Miljön utgör ett verktyg för att beröra aspekterna i existentiell hälsa, Använda aktiviteter för att väcka tankar och inre känslor samt I samtal medvetandegörs och stärks

Denna princip innebär att, eftersom huvudetableringen inte är fysiskt belägen i en med- lemsstat, kan den inte ingå i en mervärdesskattegrupp där, vilket får till

computer program called Propeller Shaft Calculator. This report doesn’t concern power losses in the different joints because there were no such general equations to be found. The

Copyright has always been the subject of two conflicting interests, that of the copyright owner and that of the public. It is up to the legislator to maintain this balance in order

An Ethnographic Study of Mechanical Help-Heart Implantation Treatment..

Skatteverket gör bedömningen att konceptet det företag som faktiskt har rätt till inkomsten inte innehåller någon begränsning av antalet bolag där avdrag kan vägras, vilket

I läroboken från år 2012 får den fysiska hälsan mest utrymme, men hälsoskildringen är mer holistisk, när exempelvis psykisk och social hälsa skildras är det inte enbart i