• No results found

Polish  Nuclear  Power  Program

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Polish  Nuclear  Power  Program"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Polish  Nuclear  Power  Program  

Tomasz  NOWACKI  

Deputy  Director  

Nuclear  Energy  Department,  Ministry  of  Economy  

POLAND  

(2)

Polish  Nuclear  Power  Program  

Ra#onale  to  introduce  nuclear  power  in  Poland:  

1.   assuring  long-­‐term  security  of  electricity  supply   2.   maintaining  electricity  prices  at  levels  

acceptable  by  the  na#onal  economy  and  the   society  

3.  reducing  emissions  of  SO 2 ,  NO X ,  PM  and  CO 2  

2

credit:  TVO  

Public engagement in the Polish nuclear power program

(3)

NPPs  around  Poland    (up  to  300  km)  

3

23  units  in  opera#on   6  units  in  construc#on    

9  units  planned  un#l  2025  r.  

  In  2020  all  neighbours  of  Poland   will  have  nuclear  power  plants.  

  From  2024  Germany  will  be  

(probably)  the  only  one  neighbour   without  NPP  despite  of  his    

considerable  import  of  electricity   from  “nuclear”  France,  Sweden,   Czech  Republic,  Switzerland  and   Poland.  

  German  NPP  will  be  shut  down,   however  their  decommissioning   will  not  be  finished  before  2050.  

65 km Baltic,

2x1200 MWe, VVER, inder construction

Visagnas, 1x1350 MWe, ABWR, planned

256 km 181 km

Ostrovets, 2x1200 MWe, VVER,

under construction

source: National Atomic Energy Agency, Ministry of Economy Polish nuclear power program – current status and prospects

(4)

Legal  framework  of  the  Nuclear  Power  Program  

•  Resolu#on  no.  4/2009  of  the  Council  of  the  Ministers  of  13  January  2009  on   nuclear  power  development  ac#vi#es  

•  Ordinance  of  the  Council  of  Ministers  of  12  May  2009  on  establishing   Government  Commissioner  for  Nuclear  Power  in  Poland  

•  Resolu#on  of  the  Council  of  Ministers  of  11  August  2009  on  „Framework  #me   schedule  for  nuclear  power  ac#vi#es”      

•  NaMonal  Energy  Policy  up  to  2030  –  approved  by  the  Council  of  Ministers  in   November  2009  

•  Law  of  May  13th,  2011  on  amendment  of  Atomic  Law  and  other  laws  -­‐  

entered  into  force  on  2011.07.01,  with  latest  amendment  on  track   (implementa#on  of  EU  ˮwaste  direc#veˮ)  

•  Law  of  June  29th,  2011  on  prepara#on  and  realiza#on  of  Investments  in   nuclear  facili#es  and  accompanying  investments  -­‐  entered  into  force  on   2011.07.01  

•  Polish  Nuclear  Power  Program  –  approved  by  the  Council  of  Ministers  on   28th  of  January  2014.    

Polish Nuclear Power Program 4

(5)

5

Status  of  implementaMon  of  the  PNPP  

PNPP  phases:  

 

•  Phase  I  –  01/01/2014  -­‐  31/12/2016:  site  selec#on,  call  for  tender  for  the  reactor   technology,  technology  selec#on  

•  Phase  II  –  01/01/2017  -­‐  12/31/2019:  draaing  of  blueprints  and  obtaining  all  required   regulatory  approvals  

•  Phase  III  –  01/01/2020  -­‐  12/31/2025:  building  permit  and  construc#on  of  the  1st  reactor   of  the  first  nuclear  power  plant,  star#ng  construc#on  of  the  2nd  reactor  

•  Phase  IV  –  01/01/2025  -­‐  12/31/2030:  comple#on  of  the  first  nuclear  power  plant  (2-­‐3   units),  beginning  of  construc#on  of  a  second  nuclear  power  plant.  The  PNPP  envisages   6,000  MWe  (i.e.  2  NPPs  with  2-­‐3  units  each)  in  nuclear  un#l  2035.  

Polish Nuclear Power Program

(6)

Main  parMcipants  of  the  Program  

Polish Nuclear Power Program 6

Minister of Economy

(NEPIO)

RWMP*

(Radwaste Agency)

President of NAEA (Regulator) Utility/NPP

Operator

*RWMP = Radioactive Waste Management Plant (ZUOP)

(7)

According  to  study  made  by  EMA  in  June  2013  the  final  electricity  consump#on  in  Poland   will  increase  by  36%  in  2030  which  is  1.5%  on  a  year-­‐by-­‐year  basis.  

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

[T W h]

Prognoza'2013 Prognoza'2011

7

Update  of  forecast  for  electricity  demand  unMl  2030    

Source: Update of forecast of fuels and energy demand, EMA, June 2013 Polish Nuclear Power Program

Total  electricity  produc#on  currently  is  ca.  160  TWh/y.  

(8)

Source:  Update  of   forecast  of  fuel  and   electricity  demand  un3l   2030,  ARE  S.A.,  June   2013  

Demand  for  electricity  in  Poland  will  grow  

8

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

[T W h]

Przemysł  i  Budownictwo Transport Rolnictwo Handel  i  Usługi Gospodarstwa  domowe Households

Agriculture

Industry and construction

Trade and services Transport

Update of forecast of final electricity demand [TWh]

Households

Trade and services

Industry and construction

Agriculture Transport

Public engagement in the Polish nuclear power program

(9)

Age  structure  of  Polish  thermal  power  plants  

9

up  to  5  years  

6%   6-­‐10  years   3%  

11-­‐15  years   6%  

16-­‐20  years   6%  

21-­‐25  years   4%  

26-­‐30  years   13%  

above  30  years   62%  

Program polskiej energetyki jądrowej

source: „Statystyka

elektroenergetyki polskiej 2011”, ARE S.A., Warszawa 2012

Z  39  GW  mocy  obecnie  ponad  6  GW  zostanie  wyłączonych  do  2020  r.,  a  kolejne  9  GW  w  latach  

2020-­‐2030  -­‐  łącznie  38%  mocy  zainstalowanej  na  dzień  dzisiejszy.  Elektrownie  jądrowe  pomogą  

uzupełnić  te  ubytki  mocy.  

(10)

Emissions of main air pollutants by the electricity generation sector in Poland (2012)

Pollutant PM SO

2

NO

X

CO Cd Pb Hg CH

4

CO

2

Amount

(tons) 17 454 366 634 216 960 39 911 84 1 694 2 512 4 255 147 338 000 Trend

2008-2012

10

source: Emitor 2012, Energy Market Agency (ARE S.A.)

credit: Leszek Koowski, CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Polish nuclear power program – current status and prospects

(11)

Coal electricity generation is more efficient and clean today, but still emitting air pollutants

Power plant Dolna Odra Jaworzno III Bełchatów Opole Pątnów II Łagisza Opole

Unit(s) no. 1 - 8 1 - 6 1 - 12 1 - 4 n/a 10 5 - 6

Capacity (MW

e

) total 1567 total 1535 total 4440 total 1492 1x 474 1x 460 2x 900

Type PC PC PL PC PL PC CFB PC

Start-up year 1974-77 1977-79 1981-88 1993-97 2008 2009 (2017-18) Main Fuel hard coal hard coal lignite hard coal lignite hard coal hard coal

PM (kg/MWh) 0,072 0,030 0,049 0,050 0,040 0,090 0,030

SO

2

(kg/MWh) 2,233 1,060 2,671 0,630 0,720 0,600 0,260 NO

X

(kg/MWh) 1,807 1,660 1,336 1,360 0,490 0,600 0,260 CO

2

(kg/MWh) 941,80 912,21 1091,00 875,00 ≈ 660,00 750,00 926,83

Environmental and climate aspects of Polish Nuclear Power Program 11

sources: utility`s environmental declarations, EIAs (for new units), corporate websites

PC – Pulverized Coal ; PL – Pulverized Lignite ; CFB – Circulating Fluidized Bed

(12)

Polityka  klimatyczna  UE    

–  następne  cele  redukcji  emisji  CO 2  

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2020  Pakiet  klimatyczno-­‐  

energetyczny   2030  Nowe  ramy  polityki   klimatycznej   (PROPOZYCJA  UE)  (luty  

2014)  

2050  Mapa  drogowa   gospodarki   niskowęglowej   (PROPOZYCJA  UE)  

wymagany  poziom  redukcji  emisji   CO2  

możliwe  zwiększenie  celu  redukcji   emisji  CO2  

emisje  CO2  dozwolone  

Program polskiej energetyki jądrowej 12

(13)

External costs of electricity production in EU (low estimate )

Environmental and climate aspects of Polish Nuclear Power Program 13

source: European Environment Agency, 2010

(14)

External costs of electricity production by power plant type

Environmental and climate aspects of Polish Nuclear Power Program 14

source:

European

Environment

Agency, 2010

(15)

McKinsey`s  curve  of  GHG  reducMon  costs  for  Poland  up  to  2030    

15

nuclear power

wind on-shore coal with CCS

Emi ssi on re du ct io n co st s EU R /t C O

2

e

Assumed price CO2: EUR 10 per tonne

Polish Nuclear Power Program

(16)

Electricity  generaMon  structure  in  2030  

16

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0 100.0 110.0 120.0 130.0 140.0 150.0 160.0 170.0 180.0 190.0 200.0

2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030

TW h

Fotowoltaika EL_geotermalne EL_Wiatr_Morze EL_Wiatr_Ląd EC_Biogaz EL  i  EC_Biomasa EC_Gaz EC_WK_Nowe EC_WK_Stare EC_Przemysłowe EL_Wodne EL_Jądrowe EL_WK_Nowe EL_WK_Stare EL_WB_Nowe EL_WB_Stare

Lignite (old) Hard coal (old)

Nuclear

Lignite (new) Hard coal (new)

Hydro Autoproducers CHP

Hard coal CHP (old)

Hard coal CHP (new)

Gas CHP (new)

Biomass Wind onshore

Wind offshore Photovoltaic

Biogas

Source:  Update  of  study  of  electricity  genera#on  costs  with  nuclear,  coal,  gas  power  plants  and  RES,  EMA,  April  2013   Polish Nuclear Power Program

(17)

17

Hard  coal   52%  

Lignite   32%  

RES   11%  

Natural   gas   3%  

Oil   2%  

2012  

Hard  coal   30%  

Lignite   23%  

Nuclear   19%  

RES   20%  

Natural   gas   7%  

Oil  

1%   2030  

Electricity  generaMon  structure  (energy  mix)  

Source: Update of forecast of fuels and energy demand, EMA, June 2013 Polish Nuclear Power Program

(18)

Future  of  nuclear  power  in  EU  -­‐    latest  EC  report  

18

Nuclear  power  will  maintain  its  role  as  an  important  source  of  electricity  and  alongside   with  RES  as  one  of  two  main  zeroemission  sources  –  according  to  the  latest  European   Commission  report  EU  Energy,  Transport  and  GHG  Emissions:  Trends  to  2050    

Nuclear  

21%   Coal  and  

lignite   7%  

Petroleum   products  

1%  

Natural  gas   18%  

Derived  gasses   1%  

Biomass   8%  

Hydro   10%  

Wind   25%  

Solar,  Mdal  etc.  

9%  

EU  energy  mix  in  2050  

source:  EU  Energy,  Transport  and  GHG   Emissions:  Trends  to  2050,  European   Commission,  2014.    

 

Electricity  produc#on  by  fuel  type.  

Polish nuclear power program – current status and prospects

(19)

19

Climate  policy  benefits  from  nuclear  power  in  Poland  

2  NPPs  with  combined  capacity     of  ca.  6  000  MWe  

Electricity  produc#on  of  50  TWh  per  year  

Saving  of  >36  million  tons*  of  CO 2  each   year  or  even  more  if  cogenera#on  

(district  hea#ng)  is  considered  

This  is  24%  of  current  CO 2  emissions  per   year  in  Polish  electricity  genera#on  sector  

*in  comparison  to  modern  coal  power  plants  with  emissions  rate  less  than  750  kg/MWh  

Public engagement in the Polish nuclear power program

(20)

Comparison  of  averaged  electricity  generaMon  costs  for   technologies  foreseen  to  implement  in  PL  from  2025  

Polish Nuclear Power Program 20

Source:  Update  of  study  of  electricity  genera#on  costs  with  nuclear,  coal,  gas  power  plants  and  RES,   EMA,  April  2013  

Assumed  discount  rate:  6%  

Nuclear  investment  cost:  €4,000,000/MWe  

21.2   23.3   40.5  

6.5  

31.1   32.9  

14.8   30.8   37.1   27.6  

53.3   64.5  

122.8  

9.4   10.1  

14.4  

5.5  

13.7   14.3  

6.2  

14.8   15.2  

17  

20.2  

30.1  

23.3  

33.7   23.4  

9.5   94.6   43.1   30.3  

65.2   35.3   41.9  

80.5   25.3   31  

16.5  

3.2  

4  

11.4   26.5   3.1   6.3  

7.9  

6.2  

7.6  

6.5  

11.3  

2.5  

2.5  

2.5  

0   20   40   60   80   100   120   140   160   180  

Har d   Co al   Li gn ite   N uc le ar  (g en  III)   N atu ral  g as   Har d   Co al  +   CC S   Li gn ite  +   CC S   GTCC   IG CC _C   IG CC _C +C CS   Bi om as s   Wi nd  o ns ho re   Wi nd  o ffs ho re   PV  

Capital  costs   O&M   Fuel   CO2   CO2  transport  and  storage   Costs  of  backup  capacity   Costs  of  power  balancing  

EU R`2 01 2/ MW h  

87,8  

64,4  

123,1  

97,5   89,4   97,6   107,4   103,5  

125,1  

83,6  

103,6  

159,9  

89,7  

(21)

21

26.4   28.9  

58.1  

8  

38.7   40.9  

18   38.3   46.2   34.3  

65.8   80.3  

151.8  

9.3   10  

14.5  

5.4  

13.5   14.1  

6.1  

14.6   14.9  

16.8  

20.1  

29.8  

23.1  

33.4   23.4  

9.3  

94.1  

42.7   30.3  

64.9  

34.9   41.5   79.9   24.4   29.8  

16  

3.1  

3.9   11.1   25.5   3  

6.3  

7.9  

6.2  

7.6  

6.5  

11.7  

2.5  

2.5  

2.5  

0   20   40   60   80   100   120   140   160   180   200  

Har d   Co al   Li gn ite   N uc le ar  (III   ge n. )   N atu ral  g as   Har d   Co al  +   CC S   Li gn ite  +   CC S   GTCC   IG CC _C   IG CC _C +C CS   Bi om as s   Wi nd  o ns ho re   Wi nd  o ffs ho re   PV  

Capital  costs   O&M   Fuel   CO2   CO2  transport  and  storage   Costs  of  backup  capacity   costs  of  power  balancing  

EU R `2 01 2/ MW h

93,4 92,1

81,9

123,6

104,3

97,1 100,2

113,3 111,8

131,0

96,0

119,2

189,1

Source:  Update  of  study  of  electricity  genera#on  costs  with  nuclear,  coal,  gas  power  plants  and  RES,   EMA,  April  2013  

Assumed  discount  rate:  8%  

Nuclear  investment  cost:  €4,000,000/MWe  

Comparison  of  averaged  electricity  generaMon  costs  for   technologies  foreseen  to  implement  in  PL  from  2025  

Polish Nuclear Power Program

(22)

22

Transboundary  consultaMons  

Transboundary  Environmental  Impact  Assessment    was  based  on:  

-­‐  Direc#ve  2001/42  EC  on  the  assessment  of  the  effects  of  certain  plans  and  programmes   on  the  environment  

-­‐  Protocol  on  Strategic  Environmental  Assessment  to  the  Conven#on  on  Environmental   Impact  Assessment  in  a  transboundary  Context  (Kiev  Protocol)    

 

From  July  to  December  2012  mee#ngs  were  held  at  the  expert  level  with  the  countries   concerned,  i.e.:  

-­‐  Slovakia  (July  23)  

-­‐  Austria  (November  22)   -­‐  Germany  (November  27)   -­‐  Denmark  (December  4).  

 

Those  countries  have  submi{ed  their  formal  final  posi#on.  The  last  transboundary  

consulta#on’s  protocol  has  been  signed  with  Austria  in  May  213,  what  formally  closed  the   transboundary  consulta#on  process.  

Public engagement in the Polish nuclear power program

(23)

Three  candidate  sites  for  the  first  NPP  locaMon   idenMfied  

•  On  25th  of    November  2011  PGE  announced  three  candidate  sites  (in  alphabe#cal   order:  Choczewo,  Gąski,  Żarnowiec)  

•  PGE  and  MoE  con#nue    informa#on  and  communica#on  campaign  in  all  three  loca#ons   and  neighbouring  areas  

•  Financing  &  Investment  analyses  on-­‐going  by  PGE  

•  Le{er  of  intent  was  signed  between  PGE,  ENEA,TAURON,  KGHM  to  set  up  joint   company  which  could  be  future  operator  and  licensee.    

•  Site  Characteriza#on  contractor  was  selected  in  January  2013  

Polish Nuclear Power Program 23

(24)

Pl. Trzech Krzyży 3/5

00-507 Warsaw tel +48 22 693 50 00 fax +48 22 693 40 46

email mg@mg.gov.pl web www.mg.gov.pl Ministry of Economy

Thank  you  for  your  amenMon  

Nuclear Energy Department

N u c l e a r E n e r g y

E v o l u t i o n i n p r o g r e s s

References

Related documents

The shape of the nitriding uptake itself, however, is most likely caused by a more subtle mechanism: as the uranium powder reacts rapidly with the nitrogen in the atmosphere closest

At first glance it is easy to draw the assumption that these cases are similar. However, upon closer inspection it is clear that these three cases all have three very

Bilderna av den tryckta texten har tolkats maskinellt (OCR-tolkats) för att skapa en sökbar text som ligger osynlig bakom bilden.. Den maskinellt tolkade texten kan

Boken är således direkt tillrättalagd för akademisk grundkursnivå: de båda författarna har stannat för de historiska sammanhang och de lit­ terära verk som

Avsnittet står i samband med de partier i brevet där Strindberg i stället för att tala så mycket om samhällskritiken i Röda rummet råder Brandes att titta

Att bedöma en författare i hans samman­ hang med hela sitt lands litteratur är alltid en mycket svår punkt att klara för en kriti­ ker som inte vuxit upp i

Bilderna av den tryckta texten har tolkats maskinellt (OCR-tolkats) för att skapa en sökbar text som ligger osynlig bakom bilden. Den maskinellt tolkade texten kan

Bilderna av den tryckta texten har tolkats maskinellt (OCR-tolkats) för att skapa en sökbar text som ligger osynlig bakom bilden. Den maskinellt tolkade texten kan