• No results found

Analysis water samples for the campaign of 1927-28 Windsor factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis water samples for the campaign of 1927-28 Windsor factory"

Copied!
15
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Copies to:

ANALYSIS OF

WATER

SAMPLES

FOR

THE C.Ati:PAIGlil

OF

1927-1928

mE

GREAT WESTERN SUGAR 001'.!PANY

i'/INI>SOR

FACTORY

General Clj.emist

General Superintendent

District f~tineer

Manager

Superintend.ant

Master

Mechanic

Laboratory

([)

(2)

Index

of

Analysis

of

Tiater Samples

PAGE

C

it

y

1:'la,

t

er

• •.•.•..••••

o • • • • •• • •• • • "' • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• • • •

1

Ditch

\~ater

•• ••••..•••

...

o • •• • • • o o o • • • • • •• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

2

Leg

Pipe

·.tater

from Condenser

of

Ean

HAIi

(Vlhi

te)

•••••••••••••••••••••

3

Leg

Pipe Water

from

Condense

r

of

Pan

"B"

(broWD.)

o••••••••••••

o

••••••

•4

'P

.... ~e

!'ipe

·.

'a.ter from

Gondenser

of

.rt:J.n

''0"

(3~omi)

•••••••••

•••••••••••

5

Leg

Pipe 'later from First Condenser

of

Evaporators

•••••••••••••

•••••

6

Leg

Pipe

'.'ia.ter

fror.i

Second

Condenser

of

Eva.porators

oe •••••••

•••

••••••

7

·,7ater

f

rom

Boiler Feed Tank

o •••••••••••••••••

••••••

o • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

8

\'later Used

for

'.'lashing

Hot

?resses

••••••••••••••••••

••••

••••••

••••

9

Battery Bu.pply ',i/ater,

Pure

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

••••••

• •

10.

(3)

Form 443-1500-;-·8-27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

······--~~~~-~~--~~-~~-~---·········Factory Kind of Water:

City

Water.

Description of Sample:

Average

for

Campaign

.

Source of Water:

G

reeley

City

d

ater

1Ia.1no

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid so,

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

COPIIDS TO General Supt. TOT AL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

1.23

003

1.2s

20

1.02

Q50

.s2

3o03

...

.

... Campa.ign __________________________________

1927-S

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,co.

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03 Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

069

7.81

.81

8.,62

(4)

Form 443-1500-·8·27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

.

.

....

... W

.indso.r .. .C.al.arado-e,. ..

...

.

...

Factory

..

...

...

....

. Campaign ...

..

...

....

..

.

... 1921~2.a

Kind of Water:

Ditch

W

ater.

Description of Sample:

Averag

e

S

ample

for Campaign.

Source of Water:

Open

D

itch from Kern

Lake,

¼

mile

No

rt

h

west of

F

actory.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid so. Carbonic Acid co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

COPIIDS TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory TOT AL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

3o62

.17

22.33

llo6l

14,.04

3o20

115q60

5.66

176023

17077

(2)

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na,so. Sodium Carbonate Na,co. Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate MgSO. Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaC12 Calcium Sulphate caso. Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

~/

"

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

3o62

s.2a

36093

63044

9ol4

035

176023

17077

194000

(5)

Form 443-1500-·8·27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

...

....

.

...

Windsor ..

C.Oloo··

·

·

···

····

···

Factory

...

.

...

.

... Cam.pa.ign

...

192-28

Kind of Water:

Leg

Pipe

Water

from

Condenser

of

\.hi

te

Pan.

(

Pan

A )

Description of Sample:

Average

Sample

for

Campaign.

Source of Water:

Ditch

Yl

ater

and

Condensation

from

P

an

11

A"

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid so.

Carbonic Acid co,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS COPIIDS TO Parts Per 100,000

2088

<117

19.17

10060

131103

3o30

101.,18

6054

157.07

20r.7i

1'171J86

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO.

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate caso,

Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

2088

5.44

33063

53

~46

50070

10.61

.35

157110'7

20279

1770.86

(6)

Form 443-1500-'-·8·27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

.

.

..

.

.

..

.

..

...

.

...

.

'.?

~~~~~!

..

~~;~.! .

...

.

.

.

.

.

...

Factory

...

.

...

.

...

...

..

.

.

Campaign

.

.

..

...

.

...

.

.

.

.

.

...

.

...

192 ...

7-28

.

Kind of Water:

Leg

Pipe

W

ater :f'rom

C

ondenser

of ?an

"B" (Brown Pan

}

Description of Sample:

A

verage

S

ample :f'or Campaigno

Source of Water:

Ditch

W

ater aud

C

ondensation from

Pan

11

B"

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100,000

Silica SiO,

3o46

Silica SiO,

Iron Fe

..

2s

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Calcium Ca

20.so

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Magnesium Mg

10.94

Sodium Carbonate Na,co.

Sodium Na

12.79

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Chlorine CI

2o90

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Sulphuric Acid so.

1

0

9084

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Carbonic Acid co,

4.

06

Calcium Chloride CaCI, Calcium Sulphate Caso. Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

165.07

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

15.39

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

COPIIDS TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt, Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory TOT AL SOLIDS

180046

TOTAL SOLIDS

(4)

Parts Per 100,000

3,46

4.78

33.69

54 .. 15

6

2~14

6

027

t.58

165.-07

15039

180046

(7)

Form 443-1500-·8·27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

...

..

.

....

..

Vindso.r .

.

C.al.o

.

...

.

.

Factory

...

...

...

Campaig.n.

...

1927~.2.S

Kind of Water:

Leg :Pipe

\iater

from Condenser of

Pan

"0" (Brovm. Pan)

Description of Sample:

Average

Sample for

Campaign.

Source of Water:

Ditch

Water

and Condensation :from

Pan

"0"

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100,000

Silica SI02

2.30

Silica SI02

Iron Fe

.21

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Calcium Ca

19.48

Sodium Sulphate Na.so.

Magnesium Mg

10096

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Sodium Na

13007

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Chlorine Cl

3.00

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Sulphuric Acid so.

107.43

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Carbonic Acid co,

3,85

Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate caco. Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

l60c.30

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

21.64

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

COPIIDS TO

TOT AL SOLIDS

181.94

TOTAL SOLIDS

Parts Per 100,000

2.30

4o94

34-.37

54.,25

57096

6

04

.44

160a30

21064

181.94

(8)

Form 443-1500- ·8·27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

.

.

..

..

.

...

...

.

.

..

.

.

...

.

.

.

Wt;).4.~9.:r. ..

9.9.l

.Ql'.

~ o r y

..

.

..

.

....

....

9

.

8).l);pa.,

_

tgn __

_

..

...

..

.

...

.

... l 92'1::-:g§3

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid so,

Carbonic Acid co.

Leg Pipe

W

a.ter from F&rst

C

ondenser of Evaporators

A

verage

S

ample for Campaign.

City

W

ater,

Ditch

W

a.ter,

and

Condensation from

-th

E

ffect

of

Evapo

rators"

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100,000

2ol8

Silica SiO,

.is

Sodium Chloride NaCl

8092

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

4o26

Sodium Carbonate Na,co.

5o62

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

lo50

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

3

7 5

&

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

6f,66

Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIIDS TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

(

6)

Parts Per 100,000

2ol8

2.47

14036

21009

15,62

10.79

.37

66.88

8.70

(9)

Form ~43-1500-·8·27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

...

.

.

.

... Windso.r

..

C.ol.00

.

.

...

Factory

...

.

...

9.ampa..iS'l'l ... ...

192.'J.~.?.8

Kind of Water:

Leg

Pipe \1ater

from

Second

Condenser of Evaporatorso

Description of Sample:

Average

Sample

for

Campaign.

Source of Water:

Ditch

Water

and

Condensation

from

5th ·~ffect

of

·

Evaporators.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid so.

Carbonic Acid co,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS COPIIDS TO Parts Per 100,000

2o40

.22

9o62

4o36

5.40

1.60

40045

s.a3

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO.

Sodium Carbonate Na,co.

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate caso.

Calcium Carbonate caco.

Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per I 00,000

2l.o58

69.88

8,072

78.60

(10)

Form, 443-1500-·8·27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

..

.

...

.

..

...

.

... !'.(iP.4.~9.:r. ..

9.9.l.9.~ ..

.

..

..

.

Factory

..

.

..

.

....

.

...

...

.

..

...

.

.. C.~ign ....

.

...

.

...

192.J:~:~8

Kind of Water:

Water from Boiler

Feed Tank.

Description of Sample:

Average Sample tor Campaign.

Source of Water:

Condens

at

ion

from all Live Steam Coils,(U

hite ans Brown Pans)

a.nd Drip

s

from 2nd,

3rd, a.nd

4th Effect

Evaporators.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid so. Carbonic Acid co,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

COPrnS TO General Supt.

General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory TOT AL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

l.25

.10

.35

.,09

1.17

1.20

1.06

.72

(8}

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO, Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na,SO, Sodium Carbonate Na,co. Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, -Magnesium Carbonate MgCO, Calcium Chloride CaCI, Calcium Sulphate CaSO, Calcium Carbonate caco. Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS ' Parts Per 100,000

1.25

lo9S

lo.20

o3l

.10

.90

021

.••.

~~

~:--·---...

~A.1 '!1'

·

~c;;-;;;~:

#

~

/..

.

... .

(11)

Form -'43-lSO!h-·8·27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

.

..

...

...

...

...

W.

~.:g.g..~9.:r;

...

9.9.l9.t.. ...

Factory

... QAm,p1;1,ign

... ...

...

..

1

gi{~g§

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid so. Carbonic Acid co,

W

ater for

Wa

shing

H

ot

Presseas

Average

S

ample for

Campaign

.

Drips

from

1

st

and

5th 3ffe

ct

Evaporators,Carbonation

and

Sulphur

Station

heating Co

ils, .All

Heaters

and

Low Pressure Coils

of

.Brown

l?

ans.,

ANALYSIS Parts Per 100,000

1.05

oOS

.13

0'02

<i55

.,

50

1'67

.21

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,so. Sodium Carbonate Na,co.

Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCI2

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate caco. Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,

Parts Per 100,000

.

82

o7l

.10

.16

c.20

.l't

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

3.21

lo67

4.ss

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

3.21

1,67

(12)

Form 443-ISOf --8-27-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

.

...

...

..

.

...

.

..

.

....

.

.

..

.. .Willd.sor. .. Oo.lo

.

..

...

Factory

..

..

...

...

..

..

.

....

.

..

.

.

. C.ampa.ign. ...

.

...

192.7.!':':28

Kind of Water:

B

attery

Supply

~

ater.

(Pure)

Description of Sample:

Average

S

ample for Campaign.

Source of Water:

Leg Pipe

W

ater from

F

irs

t

Condenser of

E

vaporator,

Overflow from Press

W

ash

T

ank a.nd

F

irs

t Ef

f

ec

t Evaporator

D

rips

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100,000

Silica SiO,

1.05

Silica SiO,

Iron Fe

olO

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Calcium Ca

078

Sodium Sulphate, 1 ,1

.

.

.

Na,so.

Magnesium Mg

019

Sodium Carbonate Na,C03

Sodium Na

..-6

3

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Chlorine Cl

.

4

0

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO.

Sulphuric Acid so.

l

o

03

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Carbonic Acid co.

1.58

Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate caso. Calcium Carbonate caco. Ferrous Carbonate Feco.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

5o76

.41

6.17

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIIDS TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

{10)

Parts Per 100,000

..

3

3

oA

2

lo95

..21

5.76

eAJ

~17

(13)

Form -.443-~l,f.:..8-26-Pads 100 - ',.. r...

,..

'

-•

WATER ANALYSIS

...

....

...

JYi.nd.s.o.r ...

.C.alo.o ...

Factory

...

.

...

Cainpaign ...

192

.... 1,..26

Kind of Wat.er:

\later

in

Boilers.

Description of Sample:

.

.Average

Sample for Campaign.

Source of Water:

~ater

taken

from each Boiler

in

Serviceo

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO General Supt. Parts Per 100,000

.52

031

.56

.30

70.02

1.50

58.80

55025

187.26

43

.14

230040

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Ch'loride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,

Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaCO,

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

.52

2o47

86.96

94.23

lo04

187.26

43oJ4

230040

(14)

Denver. Colorado. February 11.

1928.

Mr.

P • •

Gr1sa1nger.

Chief Chemist,

!he

Great Westem Sugar

Compiny.

indsor, Colorado.

Dear Sir:

·

I do not understand some

of

the relations in your

Campaign

Water

Analysis just received.

'Phe leg pipe

water

from

the two e't'a.porator condensers shows about the same amount

of total solids in eaoh oase, although the first condenser

ia

supposed to have city water in

it.

The solids in

the

water

from the second condenser looks low as compared with the solids

in the ditch water.

!l'he battery supply water has only six

parts solids and

it

does not seem that it could be this lo as

compared with the solids in the water from the first oondenser.

It

looks as

tf

your analysis

6:t

the water .from the first

con-denser must

b

.

e

wrong.

Vill you kindly oheok your figures and

·

advise w~at explanation you can otter of the above 1noonsistenoies.

s •.

T.

Osborn

s.ro-K

Very

truly yours.

\

(15)

Windsor Colorado.

l.'Ir

.

s.

J

.

Osborn, General Chemist•

~e

Great ~estern Sugar Company,

Denver Colo.

Dear Sir:

February

16 1928

.

In reply to your letter of

February

11 regarding

af

r1::a

17 28

IU'l

ijf

•s

O~flC

G.

W

.... CO

the

Total Solids

in the

two

Leg Pipe

1

.

'

.'aters of

the

Evaporator

Condenser,

I have checked these fig,~res and have come to the

conclusion that both samples were no good

.

'.J

i

e ~'irst Condenser

had nothing

but City -;-

·

ater

in

it and it should run less in

'.2otal Solids

than

City \'later

.

I believe

that

one

of my

Assistant

Chemists had the first and

Second Condensers

mixed

a.~d this of course

would

make the solids high in one and

lower in the other one than should be

.

'ille waters

were save-1 in two sets and both

sets

on the

first condenser were high in

S~lphates

.

1

believe that both

Condenser

Legs Analysis should

be rejected

.

References

Related documents

For firms using export credit guarantees, guarantees subsequently increase the probability of exporting to a foreign market (18 percentage points, pp) and export values (213 pp) but

This workshop was organised with partial support from the European Community under the European Commission Framework Programme 7 Design Studies: EUROnu (Project Number 212372).

Den ena kommer att vara de som inte bryr sig särskilt mycket om att äga musik, de som bara vill lyssna, för dem kommer tjänster som Spotify eller Last FM eller vad det

placerade så att man har genomblick till de större delarna av huset. Huset är orienterat för att erhålla maximalt med ljusinsläpp från söder, det sprids in genom köket o

By combining Tan and Sutherland’s (2014) multi- dimensional trust model with the relationships present in the sharing economy, this paper introduces a framework in which

Our working definition is in accord with these central points in Blunden’s (2015) work: each perezhivanie includes what is done and suffered and also the how of action of the

(2013) studie beskriver detta tillstånd då endast en känsla av hoppets närvaro finns, vilket kan jämföras med hur personerna i Juvakkas och Kylmäs (2009) studie också beskriver det

I den här rapporten redovisas resultaten från inventeringar av lodjur, varg, järv och kungsörn, samt länsstyrelsens bedömning av förekomsten av björn i Gävleborg