• No results found

All questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed satisfyingly

N/A
N/A
Info
Download
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "All questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed satisfyingly"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Download now ( 1 Page )

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Anna Kamenskaia Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: M18000224

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus

Course of the defence:

The student responded using slides. All questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed satisfyingly.

Ing. Lukáš Hubka, Ph.D.

How do you understand ”conference” in the relation of speech recognition?

The question was fully answered.

Ing. Martin Pustka, Ph.D.

Limits of the acoustic environment and its effect on speech transcription.

The student replied satisfyingly.

Examination Board:

Chairman: doc. Dr. Ing. Mgr. Jaroslav Hlava Vicechairman: prof. Ing. Jaroslav Nosek, CSc.

Members: prof. Dr. rer. nat. Stefan Bischoff doc. Ing. Osvald Modrlak, CSc.

Ing. Martin Pustka, Ph.D.

Ing. Lukáš Hubka, Ph.D.

Ing. Jan Koprnický, Ph.D.

Secretary: Ing. Leoš Kukačka, Ph.D.

Assessment: Excellent

Defence date: May 30, 2019 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Download now ( PDF - 1 Page - 13.99 KB )

Related documents

All the questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed with discussion

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus.. Course of

Where did you find the cost of moving the machines that you considered in your thesis? Answered Did you respect limitations of the room in your work? Answered doc

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Could you quantify the contribution of your work? Answered partially Could you assess the expected time savings using the tool that you designed? Answered partially Ing

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent doc.Ing.PavelKopeček,CSc.Whattroublesdidyoufacewithduringpreparationofyourmasterthesis?Whatwerethemainpeaksinyourwork?AnsweredWhatwasthecomputingtimen

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Šafařík: Have you been informed about thesis assessments? (Student agreed.) Questions of the supervisor and the opponent were answered

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus?. Course of

Šulc informed about the supervisors assessment

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Failed.. Course of

What is roughness? Failed to answer

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Šafařík: Have you been informed about thesis assessments? (Student agreed.) Otázky vedoucího a oponenta: (Student answered.) Prof

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent?. Course of