• No results found

CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Verygood Prof.Vítinformedaboutthesupervisorsassessment.Ing.Novosádinformedabouttheopponentsassessment.Studentansweredallquestionsofopponentandsupervisor.Prof.Fr

N/A
N/A
Info
Download
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Verygood Prof.Vítinformedaboutthesupervisorsassessment.Ing.Novosádinformedabouttheopponentsassessment.Studentansweredallquestionsofopponentandsupervisor.Prof.Fr"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Download now ( 1 Page )

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Fernando Rafael Rubio Burga Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: S18000191

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus

Course of the defence:

Prof. Vít informed about the supervisors assessment.

Ing. Novosád informed about the opponents assessment.

Student answered all questions of opponent and supervisor.

Prof. Fraňa: How many cells were used for caculation? How many examples did you calculate?

Student answered.

Assessment: Very good

Defence date: June 25, 2020 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Download now ( PDF - 1 Page - 13.86 KB )

Related documents

Preprocession of the material before entering the recycling machine

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Calculation of working hours per year for one person

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Why did you use datatype integer to store data? Answered partially Which application did you use for drawing diagrams? Answered Assessment: Very good Defence date: June 7, 2018

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment: Very good Defence date: June 13, 2017

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good?. Course of

Could you quantify the contribution of your work? Answered partially Could you assess the expected time savings using the tool that you designed? Answered partially Ing

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent doc.Ing.PavelKopeček,CSc.Whattroublesdidyoufacewithduringpreparationofyourmasterthesis?Whatwerethemainpeaksinyourwork?AnsweredWhatwasthecomputingtimen

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Šafařík: Have you been informed about thesis assessments? (Student agreed.) Questions of the supervisor and the opponent were answered

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus?. Course of

Šulc informed about the supervisors assessment

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Failed.. Course of