Förslag på vidare forskning

Detta arbete bidrar till den samtida behov av forskning om det kommunala arbetet med välfärdsteknik inom äldreomsorgen, särskilt utifrån kommunala tjänstemäns perspektiv. Med detta arbete som utgångspunkt kan en liknande studie göras på kommuner med en andel äldre som överstiger 20%, då samtliga medverkande kommuner i detta arbete hade en andel äldre mellan 15–19,4%. Kommuners befintliga och framtida andel äldre kan förstås ha en betydelse för vilka omsorgsfrågor som prioriteras.

En fördjupande studie om den heterogena användargruppen av välfärdsteknik inom äldreomsorgen kan vara av fördel för både vårdgivare, tjänsteleverantörer och kommuner. Förståelse för mötet mellan olika logiker kring välfärdsteknik skulle även bidra till optimal utformning av riktlinjer och policys. Därutöver anser jag att det skulle vara nyttigt för utvecklingen att undersöka påföljden av utredningen SOU 2020:14 för kommunerna och på vilket sätt samt för vem vision eHälsa 2025 främjat utvecklingen.

AI är en teknik med stor potential för äldreomsorgssektorn, och som har nämnts i detta arbete men inte fått ett signifikant utrymme. Det är en spännande aspekt som bör studeras, särskilt i svensk kontext och med framtida målgrupp i åtanke. Det kan även vara fördelaktigt, speciellt för oerfarna kommuner, att undersöka en specifik teknik som bara få kommuner infört. På så vis kan en kommuns implementeringsprocess från upphandling, pilottest, implementering och utvärdering observeras och utvärderas.

Vidare skulle det vara nyttigt med en studie som har större fokus på konsekvenser och möjligheter med isomorfism och normativ isomorfism, på olika nivåer. Detta eftersom det skulle generera ökad kunskap om effekten av samverkan i just denna kontext, om kommuners planering och nationella beredskap inför den demografiska utvecklingen. Slutligen finns ett kunskapsutrymme för att studera lönsamheten med eHälsomyndighetens satsning på en gemensam plattform för Sveriges kommuner att utbyta information och erfarenheter med diverse eHälsorelaterade initiativ.

Referenser

Aaen, J. (2019). Competing concerns in welfare technology innovation: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the 10th _{Scandinavian Conference on Information Systems (SCIS2019)}

Association for Information Systems, 1-18.

Aalto, K. & Kallio, K-M. (2019). Changing institutional logics: shifting to a new service model in the Finnish public sector. Public Money & Management, 39(7), 486-493.

Ahmadi, H., Arji, G., Shahmoradi, L., Safdari, R., Nilashi, M. & Alizadeh, M. (2019). The application of internet of things in healthcare: a systematic literature review and classification. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18, 837-869.

Andersson, T. & Liff, R. (2018). Co-optation as a response to competing institutional logics: Professionals and managers in healthcare. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5, 71-87. Beck, R., Gregory, R.W. & Marschollek, O. (2015). The interplay of institutional logics in IT public-private partnerships. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 46(1), 24-38. Bengtsson, E. & Yolver, Y. (2019). Äldre personers erfarenheter av användning av e-Hälsa (Kandidatuppsats). Karlskrona: Institutionen för hälsa, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola.

Bergman, M.A., Johansson, P., Lundberg, S. & Sapgnolo, G. (2016). Privatization and quality: Evidence from elderly care in Sweden. Journal of Health Economics, 49, 109-119.

Beuscart, R., Chazard, E., Duchêne, J., Ficheur, G., Renard, J.M., Rialle, V. & Souf, N. (2014). e-health. I Venot, A., Burgun, A. & Quantin, C. (red), Medical Informatics, e-Health: Fundamentals and Applications. Paris: Springer-Verlag.

Bokström, E. & Bällstav, J. (2019). Arbetet med e-hälsa och digitalisering inom sjukvården i Region Uppsala (Kandidatuppsats). Uppsala: Institutionen för informatik och media, Uppsala Universitet.

Brynn, R. (2016). Universal design and welfare technology. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 229, 335–344.

Bujnowska-Fedak, M.M. & Pirogowicz, I. (2014). Support for e-Health services among elderly primary care patients. Telemedicine and e-Health, 20(8), 696-704.

Bunduchi, R., Tursunbayeva, A. & Pagliari, C. (2020). Coping with institutional complexity: intersecting logics and dissonant visions in a nation-wide healthcare IT implementation project. Information Technology & People, 33(1), 311-339.

Bygstad, B. & Lanestedt, G. (2017). Expectations and realities in welfare technologies: a comparative study of Japan and Norway. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(2), 286-303.

Chan, M., Campo, E., Estève, D. & Fourniols, J-Y. (2009). Smart homes – current features and future perspectives. Maturitas, 64, 90-97.

Chen, C-M. (2011). Web-based remote human pulse monitoring system with intelligent data analysis for home health care. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 2011-2019.

Cook, E.J., Randhawa, G., Guppy, A., Sharp, C., Barton, G., Bateman, A. & Crawford-White, J. (2018). Exploring factors that impact the decision to use assistive telecare: perspectives of family care-givers of older people in United Kingdom. Ageing & Society, 38, 1912-1932. Cozza, M. (2018). Interoperability and convergence for welfare technology. I Zhou J. & Salvendy G. (red), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population for the aged population applications in Health, Assistance, and Entertainment (ITAP 2018). Cham: Springer.

Cozza, M., Crevani, L., Hallin, A. & Schaeffer, J. (2019). Future ageing: Welfare technology practices for our future older selves. Futures, 109, 117-129.

Currie, W.L. (2012). Institutional isomorphism and change: The national programme for IT – 10 years on. Journal of Information Technology, 27, 236-248.

Currie, W.L. & Guah, M.W. (2007). Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare. Journal of Information Technology, 22, 235-247. Dag, M., Svanelöv, E. & Gustafsson, C. (2015). Experiences of using Bestic, an eating aid for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 21(1), 87-98.

Dahler, A.M. (2018). Welfare technologies and ageing bodies: Various ways of practising autonomy. Rehabilitation Research ad Practice, 1-9.

D’Andreamatteo, A., Ianni, L., Rangone, A., Paolone F. & Sargiacomo, M. (2019). Institutional pressures, isomorphic changes and key agents in the transfer of knowledge of Lean in Healthcare. Business Process Management Journal, 25(1), 164-184.

De Cola, M.C., De Luca, R., Bramanti, A., Bertè, F., Bramanti, P. & Calabrò, R.S. (2016). Tele- health services for the elderly: A novel southern Italy family needs-oriented model. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 22(6), 356-362.

DESI. (2019). Digital Public Services. European Commission. Tillgänglig via https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/desi

DiMaggio, P.J. & Powell, W.W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. Dir. 2018:82. Välfärdsteknik i äldreomsorgen. Tillgänglig via https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/kommittedirektiv/2018/08/dir.-201882/

Dziak, M. (2019). New Public Management (NPM). Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Enbuske, A.S. (2019a). Digitalisation, work environment and personal integrity at work. Transfer: European Review of Labour & Research, 25(2), 235-242.

Enbuske, A.S. (2019b). Välfärdsteknik för trygghet, hälsa och utveckling i arbetet. Kommunal. Art nr. 9789174 797800.

Eysenbach, G. (2001). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), 1-2. Fatehi, F., Jahedi, F., Tay-Kearney, M-L. & Kanagasingam, Y. (2020). Teleophthalmology for the elderly population: A review of the literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 136, 1-8.

Findahl, O. (2015). Pensionärerna och internet. Stockholm: .SE (Stiftelsen för infrastruktur). Frennert, S. (2019). Lost in digitalization? Municipality employment of welfare technologies. Disability and rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(6), 635-642.

Frennert, S. & Baudin, K. (2019). The concept of welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-8.

Frennert, S. & Östlund, B. (2018). Narrative review: Welfare technologies in eldercare. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 6(1), 21-34.

Friedland, R. & Alford, R.R. (1991). Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. I Powell, W.W. & DiMaggio, P.J. (red), The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

From, D-M. (2015). With a little help from a… machine. Digital welfare technology and sustainable human welfare. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 14(2), 52- 64.

Gams, M., Gu, I.Y-H., Härmä, A., Muñoz, A. & Tam, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence and ambient intelligence. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 11, 71-86. Gjestsen, M.T., Wiig, S. & Testad, I. (2017). What are the key contextual factors when preparing for successful implementation of assistive living technology in primary elderly care? A case study from Norway. BMJ Open, 7(9), 1-9.

Gokalp, H., deFolter, J., Verma, V., Fursse, J., Jones, R. & Clarke, M. (2018). Review: Integrated telehealth and telecare for monitoring frail elderly with chronic disease. Telemedicine and e-Health, 24(12), 940-957.

Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135-146.

Gustafsson, C., Svanberg, C. & Müllersdorf, M. (2015). Using a robotic cat in dementia care: A pilot study. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 41(10), 46-56.

Han, H., Ma, X. & Oyama, K. (2016). Towards detecting and predicting fall events in elderly care using bidirectional electromyographic sensor network. IEEE/ACIS 15th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS), Okayama, konferensmaterial, 1-6. Hasselblad, A. (2019). Welfare technology policy and practice – A conceptual analysis. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 69-73.

Hinings, B. (2012). Connections between institutional logics and organizational culture. Journal of Management Inquiry, 21(1), 98-101.

Hofmann, B. (2013). Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 389-406.

Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3-19. Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variation on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93-109.

Huttunen, H-L., Halonen, R. & Ferreira, D. (2018). Identifying bottlenecks in work processes: elderly care. IEEE 6th International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), Vienna, konferensmaterial, 1-8.

Iakovidis, I., Wilson, P. & Healy, J.C. (2004). E-Health: Current Situation and Examples of Implemented and Beneficial E-Health Applications. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

IoT Sverige. (u.å.). Om Skellefteå kommuns arbete med IoT i äldreomsorgen. Tillgänglig via https://iotsverige.se/skelleftea-kommun/

Iyamu, T. (2018). Collecting qualitative data for information systems studies: The reality in practice. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 2249-2264.

Jarl, M. & Kjellsson, M. (2016). Äldre personers erfarenhet och syn på eHälsa – En fokusgruppsintervjustudie (Magisteruppsats). Karlskrona: Institutionen för hälsa, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola.

Johansson, L., Sundström, G. & Malmberg, B. (2018). Ett halvt århundrade svensk äldreomsorg – var står stat och familj? Tidsskrift för omsorgsforskning, 4(1), 62-68.

Kankam, P.K. (2019). The use of paradigms in information research. Library and Information Science Research, 41(2), 85-92.

Labiris, G., Panagiotopoulou, E-K. & Kozobolis, V. (2018). A systematic review of teleophthalmological studies in Europe. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 11(2), 314- 325.

Lanne, M., Tuisku, O., Melkas, H. & Niemelä, M. (2020). My business or not? The perspective of technology companies on shifting towards care robotics. European Planning Studies, 28(2), 296-318.

Larab, A., Conchon, E., Bastide, R. & Singer, N. (2012). A sustainable software architecture for home care monitoring applications. 6th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), Campione d'Italia, 1-6.

Lee, J-V., Chuah, Y-D. & Chieng, K.T.H. (2013). Smart elderly home monitoring system with an android phone. International Journal of Smart Home, 7(3), 17-32.

Lilja, K.K. & Palomäki, J. (2017). The use of advanced imaging technology in welfare technology solutions – some ethical aspects. 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture, Transmission and Display of 3D Video (3DTV-CON), Köpenhamn, konferensmateral 1-4. Lindgren, P. (2019). Ersättningen och e-hälsan. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

Lundin, A. (2017). Rättfärdigade prioriteringar – en kvalitativ analys av hur personal i äldreomsorgen hanterar motstridiga verksamhetslogiker (Doktorsavhandling). Skövde: Hälsohögskolan, Jönköping universitet.

Lundquist, L. (2006). Den politiska demokratin, ekonomismen och förvaltningsetiken. I Brytting, T. (red.), Etik i medborgarens tjänst – en antologi om förvaltningsetik. Stockholm: Statens kvalitets- och kompetensråd (Verva).

Lyth, J., Lind, L., Persson, H.L. & Wiréhn, A-B. (2019). Can a telemonitoring system lead to decreased hospitalization in elderly patients? Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 1-8. Mach, K-M. (2017). Implementering av IT-lösningar i äldreomsorgen: hur nystartade e- hälsoföretag kan skapa en lönsam position med innovativa IT-lösningar (Mastersuppsats). Uppsala: Institutionen för teknikvetenskaper, Uppsala Universitet.

Mano, L.Y., Faical, B.S., Nakamura, L.H.V., Gomes, P.H., Libralon, G.L., Meneguete, R.I., Filho, G.P.R., Giancristofaro, G.T., Pessin, G., Krischnamachari, G. & Ueyama, J. (2016). Exploiting IoT technologies for enhancing Health Smart Homes through patient identification and emotion recognition. Computer Communications, 89-90, 178-190.

Marchesoni, M.A., Axelsson, K., Fältholm, Y. & Lindberg, I. (2017). Going from “paper and pen” to ICT systems: Perspectives on managing the change process. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 42(2), 109-121.

Maresca, G., De Cola, M.C., Caliri, S., De Luca, R., Manuli, A., Scarcella, I., Silvestri, G., Bramanti, P., Torrisi, M., Calabrò, R.S. & Bramanti, A. (2019). Moving towards novel multidisciplinary approaches for improving elderly quality of life: The emerging role of telemedicine in Sicily. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 25(5), 318-324.

Melkas, H., Hennala, L., Pekkarinen, S. & Kyrki, V. (2020). Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly care institutions. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 134, 1-6.

Miah, S.J., Shen, J., Lamp, J., Kerr, D. & Gammack, J. (2019). Emerging Insights of Health Informatics Research: A Literature Analysis for Outlining new Themes. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23, 1-18.

Myers, M.D. & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17(1), 2-26.

Mörk, E., Erlingsson, G.Ó. & Persson, L. (2019). Kommunernas framtid. Konjunkturrådets rapport. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.

Niehaves, B. & Plattfaut, R. (2014). Internet adoption by the elderly: employing IS technology acceptance theories for understanding the age-related digital divide. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(6), 708-726.

Nilsson, I. (2012). Seniorers inklusion och delaktighet i samhället genom internet. I Gard, G. & Wikman, A.M. (red), E-hälsa – innovationer, metoder, interventioner och perspektiv. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.

Nymberg, V.M., Bolmsjö, B.B., Wolff, M., Calling, S., Gerward, S. & Sandberg, M. (2019). ‘Having to Learn This so Late in Our Lives…’ Swedish Elderly Patients’ Beliefs, Experiences, Attitudes and Expectations of e-Health in Primary Health Care. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 37(1), 41-52.

Oh, H., Rizo, C., Enkin, M. & Jadad, A. (2005). What is eHealth (3): A systematic Review of published definitions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 7(1), 1-12.

Paige, S.R., Stellefson, M., Krieger, J.L., Anderson-Lewis, C., Cheong, J.W. & Stopka, C. (2018). Proposing a Transactional Model of eHealth Literacy: Concept Analysis. Journal of Medical Internet research, 20(10).

Pirhonen, J., Melkas, H., Laitinen, A. & Pekkarinen, S. (2019). Could robots strengthen the sense of autonomy of older people residingin assisted living facilities? – a future-oriented study. Ethics and Information Technology, 1-12.

På Maintenance Management Model [På AB]. (2018). Pm3 Modellbeskrivning. Danderyd: På i Stockholm AB.

Reay, T., Goodrick, E., Waldorff, S.B. & Casebeer, A. (2017). Getting leopards to change their spots: Co-creating a new professional role identity. Academy of Management Journal, 60(3), 1043-1070.

Regeringen. (2017). N2017/03643/D. För ett hållbart digitaliserat Sverige – en digitaliseringsstrategi. Näringsdepartementet, Regeringskansliet. Tillgänglig via https://www.regeringen.se/informationsmaterial/2017/05/for-ett-hallbart-digitaliserat-sverige- --en-digitaliseringsstrategi/

Regeringen & SKR. (2016). S2016/01874/FS. Vision e-Hälsa 2025. Socialdepartementet, Regeringskansliet. Art nr. S2016.004. Tillgänglig via https://ehalsa2025.se/om-e-halsa-2025/ Regeringen & SKR. (2020). En strategi för genomförande av Vision e-Hälsa 2025: Nästa steg på vägen 2020–2022. Regeringskansliet och SKR, Stockholm. Tillgänglig via https://ehalsa2025.se/om-e-halsa-2025/

Rodrigues, N. & Pereira, A. (2018). A user-centred well-being home for the elderly. Applied Sciences, 8(850), 1-16.

Ryan, G.W. & Bernard, H.R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85- 109.

Sarker, S., Xiao, X. & Beaulieu,T. (2013). Qualitative Studies in Information systems: A critical review and some guiding principles. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), iii-xviii.

SCB. (2019a). Kommuner i siffor: Västerås. Tillgänglig via https://www.scb.se/hitta- statistik/sverige-i-siffror/kommuner-i-siffror/#?region1=1980&region2=

SCB. (2019b). Kommuner i siffror: Stockholm. Tillgänglig via https://www.scb.se/hitta- statistik/sverige-i-siffror/kommuner-i-siffror/#?region1=0180&region2=

SCB. (2019c). Kommuner i siffror: Uppsala. Tillgänglig via https://www.scb.se/hitta- statistik/sverige-i-siffror/kommuner-i-siffror/#?region1=0380&region2=

SCB. (2019d). Kommuner i siffror: Linköping. Tillgänglig via https://www.scb.se/hitta- statistik/sverige-i-siffror/kommuner-i-siffror/#?region1=0580&region2=

Schultze, U. & Avital, M. (2011). Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Information and Organization, 21, 1-16.

Shaw, T., McGregor, D., Brunner, M., Keep, M., Janssen, A. & Barnet, S. (2017). What is eHealth (6)? Development of a conceptual model for eHealth: Qualitative study with key informants. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(10), 1-12.

SFS 2017:30. Hälso- och sjukvårdslag [HSL]. Socialdepartementet. SFS 2017:725. Kommunallag [KL]. Finansdepartementet.

Sjölinder, M. & Nöu, A.A. (2014). Indoor and outdoor social alarms: Understanding users’ perspectives. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 2(1), 1-9.

Socialstyrelsens Termbank. (u.å.). Välfärdsteknik. Tillgänglig via https://termbank.socialstyrelsen.se/?fTerm=v#results

SOU 2020:14. Framtidens teknik i omsorgens tjänst. Tillgänglig via https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2020/03/sou- 202014/

Steinbach, M. & Süß, S. (2018). Administrators’ identities and strategies in the e-participation innovation process: a qualitative analysis of institutional logics and institutional work in German municipalities. Information Polity, 23, 281-305.

Szebehely, M., Stranz, A. & Strandell, R. (2017). Vem ska arbeta i framtidens äldreomsorg? (Arbetsrapport). Stockholm: institutionen för socialt arbete, socialhögskolan, Stockholms Universitet.

Thornton, P.H. & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in organizations: executive succession in the higher education publishing industry 1858- 1990. The American Journal of Sociology, 105(3). 801-843.

Thornton, P.H. & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional Logics. I Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K.& Suddaby, R. (red.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.

TioHundra. (2019). Unik samverkan med Norrtäljemodellen. Tillgänglig via https://www.tiohundra.se/norrtaljemodellen

Tsertsidis, A. (2020). Challenges in the provision of digital technologies to elderly with dementia to support ageing in place: a case study of a Swedish municipality. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1-10.

Van den Broek, J., Boselie, P. & Paauwe, J. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in health care – ‘productive ward: releasing time to care’. Public Management Review, 16(1), 1-20.

Västerås Stad. (u.å.). Välfärdsteknologi på äldreboenden. Tillgänglig via https://www.vasteras.se/kommun-och-politik/vasteras-utvecklas/valfard-och-

halsa/valfardsteknologi-pa-aldreboenden.html

Waldorff, S.B. (2013). Accounting for organizational innovations: Mobilizing institutional logics in translation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 29, 219-234.

Wallin, A.J. & Fuglsang, L. (2017). Service innovations breaking institutionalized rules of health care. Journal of Service Management, 28(5), 972-997.

Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74-81.

Warpenius, E., Alasaarela, E., Sorvoja, H. & Kinnunen, M. (2015). A mobile user-interface for elderly care from the perspective of relatives. Informatics for Health & Social Care, 40(2), 113- 124.

Wen, H.J. & Tan, J. (2003). The Evolving Face of Telemedicine & e-Health: Opening Doors and Closing Gaps in E-Health Services Opportunities & Challenges. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, konferensmaterial, 1-12.

Wickramasinghe, N., Bali, R.K., Suomi, R. & Kirn, S. (2012). Critical Issues for the Development of Sustainable e-Health Solutions. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. Wicks, P., Stamford, J., Grootenhuis, M.A., Haverman, L. & Ahmed, S. (2014). Innovations in e-health. Qualitive of Life Research, 23(1), 195-203.

Wikman, A.M. (2012). Definitioner och modeller för e-hälsa. I Gard, G. & Wikman, A.M. (red), E-hälsa – innovationer, metoder, interventioner och perspektiv. Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.

Woll, A. & Bratteteig, T. (2019). A trajectory for technology-supported elderly care work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28, 127-168.

World Health Organization [WHO]. (u.å.). eHealth at WHO. Tillgänglig via https://www.who.int/ehealth/about/en/

Yu, Y-C. (2018). A practical digital door lock for smart home. IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), konferensmaterial, 1-2.

Zhou, F., Jiao, J., Chen, S. & Zhang, D. (2011). A case-driven ambient intelligence system for elderly in-home assistance applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems and Cybernetics – Part C: Applications and Reviews, 41(2), 179-189.

Östlund, B. (2017). Digitizing Health Care. The 2017 4th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI 2017), konferensmaterial, 78-83.

i