• No results found

Analysis of water samples saved during the campaign 1939-40 and during the intercampaign of 1940 for Great Western Sugar Company Mitchell factory

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples saved during the campaign 1939-40 and during the intercampaign of 1940 for Great Western Sugar Company Mitchell factory"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

THE GREl!.T

WESTERl'l"

SUGAR

COt'fPAi'iY

M

itchell

Factory

Analysis of

Water

Samples Saved During the Campaign 1939-40

and

During the Intercampaign of 1940.

Copies

to:-Gene

ral

Chemist

Genera

l

Superintendent

Asst.

Gen

'l

Supt.

District

£ngineer

... .f ---Jt..

414;, li;,,

GfNJl , .,

..

t:14i.

G,

w.

liJE:l'r11sr

, S.

Cq

~fCEIVt~

.JYU

6 194

GEN'L

CHEMIS[

G.

W,

~

CO,

(2)

I

N

D E X

Kind

of

Water

Page

Deep "'Well ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

1

lt

ain

\?Jat

er

Supp

ly •...••••••••••••.••••••••.•.•..•

2 Battery Supply••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 3

P

ress

;.V

a.sh

...

4

11'h

i

te

Centrifugal

~lash

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••

5

:Boiler

Feed

...

6

Water

in

Boilers

...

7

B

oiler

Feed

- Interca

mp

aign

••••••••••••••••••••••

8

(3)

Form 443-2M- 8-36- Pads 100

-.

;

WATER ANALYSIS

_

_

__

_____

_

:M

ITCHELL _

_

____

__

__

_____

_

___

_

___

_

__ Factory

lv,a

y 15

19:/

1940

---

---·-Kind of Water:

Deep

\,iell

Description of Sample:

Average

Sample for the Campaign

,

sampled from the cold water in laboratory

.

Source of Water:

A

deep well located

N

orth of the factory

.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO. Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chiorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

7

.

75

.

17

6

.

92

2

.

04

4

.

39

1

.

58

10

.

70

13

.

28

46

.

83

.

07

46

.

90

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate SiO, NaCl Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,COa

Magnesium Chloride MgCI.

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaCl, CaSO, CaCOa FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

7

.7

5

2

.

60

10

.

41

4.59

3

.

85

17

.

28

.

35

46

.

83

.

07

46

.

90

~ - - -

Chief Chemist.

-

----

-

---·-

-/ /

(4)

Form 443-2M- 8-36- Pads 100

-WATER ANALYSIS

_

___

_

_

_

____

_____

_

1I

I

TCHELL

___

_

_____

_

_________ Factory

______________________ )1.a;y _

1

5

___

___

_______

_

_______ 19g.l:

O

_

_

_

_

Kind of Water:

1

.!.A.IN JATER

Slf.2l?LY

Description of Sample:

Average

sample for the campaign

,

sampled from

main

water supply tank

.

Source of Water:

Seepage and

r

un-off waters taken from Dry

Spotted

Tail drain ditch about

one

mile West

and

lforth

of factory

.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so

,

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

6

.

59

.13

3

.

69

1

.

67

5

.

45

1.60

11

.

65

8

.

26

39

.

04

.

01

39

.

05

-

2

-HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate SiO, NaCl Na,SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,

Magnesium Chloride MgCl.

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaCl, CaSO.

c

a

c

o

.

FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

:?"

Parts Per 100,000

6

.

59

2

.

64

13

.

62

3

.

06

3

.

64

9

.

22

.

27

39

.

04

.

01

39

.

05

Chief Chemist.

(5)

Form 443-2M- 8-36-Pads 100

-WATER ANALYSIS

_

_

_

____

_

_

___

__

___

MITCHELL

_

_

____

_

__

_

________

Factory

_

_____

_

__

_

_

__

_

_

_

__________

May

_

___

______

15

_

___

_

_

___

_

_

__

_

___

_____

193

_

_

40

_

____ _

Kind of Water:

BAT'l

1

ERY

SUPPLY

Description of Sample:

Average

sample for the campaign

,

sampled daily from the battery

supply

water

te..nk:

.

Source of Water:

Overflow from press wash water tank made up to required volume by

wate

r

from seal

tank of evaporator leg pipe

.

Raw water is added

when

needed to

lower the tempe

r

ature of battery supply water

.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so,

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory Parts Per 100,000

4

.

88

.

11

4

.

59

1

.

12

3

.

86

1

.

60

8

.

09

8

.

37

32

.

62

.7

4

33

.

36

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Si02 NaCl Na.SO, Sodium Carbonate Na.CO, Magnesium Chloride MgCl2 Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaC12 CaSO, CaCOa FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

4

.

88

2

.

64

8

.

71

2

.

76

1

.

94

11

.

46

.

23

32

.

62

.7

4

33

.

36

(6)

Form 443-2M-8-36-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

____

__

___

__

____

__

____

Ji

:'.:

J_'f.QHJ_~lf

_

______

________

Factory

__________________________________

ay

__

15

_____________

19

,j

4IJ

__ _

Kind of Water: PRESS WASH

Description of Sample:

Average sam

p

le for the campaign

,

sampled from press wash water tank.

Source of Water:

Overflow from Boiler Peed

tank,

drips from battery heaters

,

a.11 juice heaters

and from steam coils in 2nd Sat

.

tanks and blow

-

up

tanks

when coils

in

tanks

are used for heating

,

drips from 1st Effect of evaporators

.

Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid SiO, Fe Ca Mg Na Cl

so,

co.

ANALYSIS Parts Per 100,000

.

36

.12

.13

.

07

.

28

.

38

.13

.

44

(

1;

~

in Dry Sub

.,

P•P•

100

,

000

.04)

,(Fr_~e NH3

in Orig.

W

ater

,

p

•P•

million

-

4]P

l

(

Total

IIB3 "

"

t1 tr

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

"

44

~,

,

1

.

91

.

49

2

.

40

-4-HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate SiO, NaCl Na,SO, Sodium Carbonate Na,COa Magnesium Chloride MgCl2 Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaCl, CaSO. CaCOa FeCO.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

I

Parts Per 100,000

.

36

.

63

.09

.09

.17

.

32

.

25

1.91

.49

2.4fJ

(7)

Form 443-2M- 8-36--i'ads 100

-WATER

ANALYSIS

_

____

__

___ :M

I

~CHE.LL

__

____

__

_

____

_

_________

_

__ Factory

_

__

_

___

_

_

_

_

__

____

_

_

_

__

_

_

___

:May_

l 5

__

____

__

___

_____

_

19'( ..

40

Kind of Water:

·

,fr

lITE C

BN

T

RI1i

'UG

A

L

1/

ASH

Description of Sample:

Average sample for the campai

g

n

,

sampled

f

rom centrifugal

w

ash

water pump

.

Source of Water:

Drips from 3rd effect of evaporators

,

any deficiency being supplied from

boiler feed

.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parts Per 100~ Parts Per 100,000

Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

.53

.

10

.

10

.

07

.

20

.

43

.

18

.

2

1

1

.

82

.

3

0

2

.

12

Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Sodium Carbonate SiO, NaCl Na,SO, Na,COa Magnesium Chloride MgCl,

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO. Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

Calcium Chloride CaCl,

Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaSO, CaCOa FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

.

53

.

51

.16

.

15

.09

.

17

.

21

1

.

82

.

30

2

.

12

(8)

Form 443- 2:M-8-36-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

______ ...

MlT

.C

.HE~

... Factory

·---·--·---·--·-··--··-····-·-····--19 ····-···

May 15

'

40

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co.

Ammonia

liffi4

BOILER FEED

Average

sample

for the

campaign,

sampled daily from boiler feed

wate

r

tank.

Drips

coils

of white pan

,

calandrias of raw pans

,

steam chests

of

2nd

,

3rd

,

4th

&

5th

effects

of

evaporators and drips from steam traps

on

main

steam lines

,

granulator radiators and

radiators

of the heating

system.

ANALYSIS Parts Per 100,000

.

55

.16

.

26

.10

.

30

.

58

.52

.

30

.oe

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Ammonium Chloride NH4Cl

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na.SO, Sodium Carbonate Na.CO. Magnesium Chloride MgCl2 Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCO. Calcium Chloride CaC12

Parts Per 100,000

.56

.

24

.6

9

.09

.

49

(

F

ree

NH3

in Orig water

,

P•P•

million

20)

32)

Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaSO,

caco.

FeCO.

.24

.22

.

33

(To'eal"

"

"

"

It ff

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

CA'J'{PAIGN .AVERAGES

Total Solids

Hardness

A

lkalinity

2

.

85

1.04

3

.

89

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

4.2

/ /

··+ ,c....···~···'····C-.L~···· (,

-

6-2

.

86

1

.

04

3

.

89

(9)

Form 443- 2M-8-36-Pads 100

WATER ANALYSIS

__

_

_

_

_

__

__

___

_

MITCHELL

__

__

________

__

_____

_

__

Factory

··-···-Mq _

15

___

_

_

___

__

_

____

_

_______

__

___

_

__ 19i_ 40

Kind of Water: 1

ATER

IN BOILERS

Description of Sample:

Ave

r

age

Sample fo

r t

he

c

ampaign

.

Al

l

bo

il

er

s i

n

s

erv

ic

e we

re s

ampled

da

i

ly fr

o

m _the water columns

o

Source of Water:

a

t

e

r actual

l

y i

n bo

il

e

rs.

At

t

he

s

tart

o

f

c

ampaign boilers

we

r

e

I11led

witn

a.eep well water

so1

·

tened in Z.eoli

te

softener

.

ANALYSIS Parts Per 102:,_000 Silica Si02

5

.

0

1

Iron Fe

.

22

Calcium Ca

.

42

Magnesium Mg r

,

18

Sodium Na

51

.

20

Chlorine Cl

2

.

48

Sulphuric Acid

so

.

40

.

11

Carbonic Acid

co

.

38

.

86

Ammonia

NH4

.04

.Phosphate.

P04

2

.

20

{Free

NH3

in orig

.

water

,

p

.

p

.

million

-

4)

{Total"

"

"

"

fl

"

6

}

140

,

80

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

7

.

11

TOTAL SOLIDS

147

91

COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

CHil.ICALS

ADDED TO BOILERS

Soda A.sh

Tri-Sod

.

Phosphate

Salt to Softener

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO.

Ammonium Chloride NH4Cl

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na.SO,

Sodium Ci!!bonate

t

Na.CO.

Sodium ~nospha

e Na3P04

Magnesium Chloride MgCl2

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa

Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaCI, CaSO.

c

aco

.

FeCO,

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

LBS

.

PER

DAY

TOTAL SOLIDS

CAr,.'..PAIGN AVERAGES

Parts Per 100,000

5

.

01

.

12

3,96

59.31

66.33

3o94

062

1

.

05

.46

140

.

80

7

,

11

147, 91

LBS

600

250

12,5

5

.

2

o

.

o

Total Solids

156

lkalinity

,

005

0

Hardness

0

.

4

P04

,

P

P•

!Jlillion

--7

18

~ i ~-i

(10)

Form 443-2M-8-36- Pads 100

""-.:

WATER ANALYSIS

_______

:M.I

_

'l:QHELL

_

__

__

_

_____

__

___

__

_____

__

_

_

__ Factory

________________________ Jyfey __

l5

__

___

__

_

_

__

_

_

_______ 19,

4Q

__ _

Kind of Water:

BOILER FBED

-

I

NTER

CA

MPAIGN

Description of Sample:

Sampled weekly

from

boiler feed pump during the period Dec

.

1 to

lJ.a.y

1

,

1940

.

Source of Water:

Condensate from exhaust steam

in

battery heaters and radiators of the

heating

system

made

up

to required volume

with water from

deep

well

softened

in

~eolite

water

softener

.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

Period

Alkalinity

Hardness

Total

Solids

Parts Per lOOJ!Q!!

2

.

19

.1

3

.

64

.

25

3

.

06

1

.

09

3

.

09

2

.

86

13

.

31

.

74

14

.

05

Averages

.0000

1

.

3

14

.

05

-

8

-HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Sodium Carbonate Si02 NaCl Na.SO, Na.COa Magnesium Chloride MgCl2 Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaCl2 CaSO, CaCOa FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS - - ~ Parts Per 100,000

2

.

19

1

.

80

4

.

57

2

.

01

.

87

1

.

60

.

27

13

.

:31

.

74

14

.

05

(11)

Form 443-2M- 8-36-_Pa.,ds 10('

-WATER

ANALYSIS

MI TCH~LL

____________

Factory

---

-

---····-·---~'-ay _

15

_

__

_

_

___

_

_

_

_

_

_____ 19:/ __

40

Kind of Water:

WATER IN SHOP BOILER

-

INTERCAMPAIGN

Description of Sample:

Aver

age sa..~ple fo

r

the intercampaign period Dec 1 to May 1

, 1940

,

sampled

weekly from the water column of the boile

r,

filtered and composited

.

Source of Water:

~ater

actually in boiler.

ANALYSIS Parts Per 100,000 Silica SiO.

31

.1

8

Iron Fe

.

16

Calcium Ca

.

46

Magnesium Mg

.

13

Sodium Na

108

.

05

Chlorine Cl

11

.

81

Sulphuric Acid

so.

55

.

75

Carbonic Acid

co.

90

.

10

Phosphate

P04

7

.

64

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

305

.

28

16

.

83

322

.

11.

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. General Supt. District Engineer Superintendent Laboratory

Chemicals Used

Socia

~sh

Caustic Soda

l11ono-

S0d.

1-'hosphate

Tri-

Sod

.

Phosphate

clalt to Softener

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate SiO, NaCl Na,SO, Sodil}m Ciu.:bonat~

t

Na,COa

Sodium !'ho spna e Na3P04

Magnesium Chloride MgCl, Magnesium Sulphate MgSO, Magnesium Carbonate MgCOa Calcium Chloride Calcium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate CaCb CaSO,

caco

.

FeCOa

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

Lbs

Period A

verages

Parts Per 100,000

31

.

18

19

.

47

82

.

44

157

.

07

13

.

19

.

45

1.15

.

33

305

.

28

16

.

83

322

.

11

0 0

10

25

2200

Total Solids

294

Alkalinity

.

054

Hardness

0

.

4

P~

.I:'

.

P

.

~ ~ =::::·::;.;:

2

4 - ~ ~

~ -ci~~t.-·

··

References

Related documents

On 27 November 2014, the government introduced the Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA), which means that the tourist now has to apply for the visa online, carry a copy of the

For firms using export credit guarantees, guarantees subsequently increase the probability of exporting to a foreign market (18 percentage points, pp) and export values (213 pp) but

Land use planning has been proven an effective tool in addressing the impacts of climate change and natural hazards, as well as in minimizing risk and

For the design of the structure that support the Mahle Range Extender and the fuel tank, its shape was chosen as a triangular configuration as shown in Chapter

Detta kan vara ett sätt för dem att skapa förtroende hos mottagaren eftersom de på så vis inte upplevs som säljare som försöker tvinga på mottagaren något vilket kan bidra

På så sätt kunde datainsamlingen säkerställa att felaktig information som inte bekräftas från samtliga metoder upptäcktes samt öka förståelsen för introduktionen

In this preliminary work we explored the prediction of musical so- phistication subscales (i.e., emotions and active engagement) from music listening behavior.. Our results show

By investigating the applied diversity on different levels of music characteristics (i.e., artist and genre level), we found that on a general level musically sophisticated users