Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 160 8 USL 168
Char.No. Construction Unit Fd/dm -8 LSL 152
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:18:43 PM to 5/11/2010 12:18:43 PM Remark
152 154 156 158 160 162 164 166 168
Warp [Fd/dm] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL USL
x x-3s x+3s
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Relative frequency [%] →
152 154 156 158 160 162 164 166 168 Warp [Fd/dm] ND →
0 10 20 30 40 50
Absolute frequency →
LSL x USL
x-3s x+3s
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
152 154 156 158 160 162 164 166 168 Warp [Fd/dm] ND →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x USL
x-3s x+3s
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 2.76 ≤ 3.30 ≤ 3.85
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp 2.80 ≤ 3.34 ≤ 3.90 0 1.671.67
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Normal Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00000%
n <LSL 0
p>USL 0.00000%
n >USL 0
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
6s 4.78
R 3
T 16
x+3s 162.30
xmax 162
USL 168
x-3s 157.51
xmin 159
LSL 152
x 159.90
Tm 160
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 160 8 USL 168
Char.No. Construction Unit Fd/dm -8 LSL 152
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:20:37 PM to 5/11/2010 12:20:37 PM Remark
152 154 156 158 160 162 164 166 168
Weft [Fd/dm] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL USL
x Xlo3
Xup3
0 10 20 30 40 50
Relative frequency [%] →
152 154 156 158 160 162 164 166 168 Weft [Fd/dm] MD →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Absolute frequency →
LSL x USL
Xlo3 Xup3
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
152 154 156 158 160 162 164 166 168 Weft [Fd/dm] MD →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x USL
Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.48 ≤ 1.78 ≤ 2.08
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp 2.96 ≤ 3.53 ≤ 4.11 0 1.671.67
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Mixed Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00000%
n <LSL 0
p>USL 0.00000%
n >USL 0
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 4.53
R 2
T 16
Xup3 158.20
xmax 157
USL 168
Xlo3 153.66
xmin 155
LSL 152
x 155.80
Tm 160
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Nom.Val. 0.38 0.10 USL 0.48
Char.No. Gauge Unit mm -0.10 LSL 0.28
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 2
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:21:14 PM to 5/11/2010 12:21:14 PM Remark
0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
[mm] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL USL
x
Xlo3
Xup3
0 10 20 30 40 50
Relative frequency [%] →
0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
[mm] MD →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Absolute frequency →
LSL x USL
Xlo3 Xup3
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45
[mm] MD →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x USL
Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 2.23 ≤ 2.68 ≤ 3.12
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp 2.58 ≤ 3.08 ≤ 3.59 0 1.671.67
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Mixed Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00000%
n <LSL 0
p>USL 0.00000%
n >USL 0
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 0.0649
R 0.05
T 0.20
Xup3 0.4299
xmax 0.42
USL 0.48
Xlo3 0.3650
xmin 0.37
LSL 0.28
x 0.4000
Tm 0.38
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Nom.Val. 245 5 USL 250
Char.No. Mass Unit g/m2 -5 LSL 240
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:21:39 PM to 5/11/2010 12:21:39 PM Remark
240 242 244 246 248 250 252 254 256
[g/m2] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL USL x
x-3s x+3s
0 5 10 15 20 25
Relative frequency [%] →
240 242 244 246 248 250 252 254 256 [g/m2] ND →
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Absolute frequency →
LSL USLx
x-3s x+3s
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
240 242 244 246 248 250 252 254 256
[g/m2] ND →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL USLx
x-3s x+3s
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were not met (Tp,Tpk) Critical performance index Tpk -0.04 ≤ 0.04 ≤ 0.12
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Performance index Tp 0.76 ≤ 0.91 ≤ 1.05 0 1.671.67
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Normal Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00001%
n <LSL 0
p>USL 44.98587%
n >USL 49
p<T> 55.01413 %
n<T> 76
6s 11.05
R 7
T 10
x+3s 255.29
xmax 253
USL 250
x-3s 244.24
xmin 246
LSL 240
x 249.77
Tm 245
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 3500 USL
Char.No. Tensile Unit N/50mm 0 LSL 3500
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:22:03 PM to 5/11/2010 12:22:03 PM Remark
3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300
Warp [N/50mm] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL x
x-3s x+3s
0 4 8 12 16 20
Relative frequency [%] →
3600 3800 4000 4200
Warp [N/50mm] ND →
0 5 10 15 20 25
Absolute frequency →
LSL x
x-3s x+3s
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 Warp [N/50mm] ND →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x
x-3s x+3s
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.67 ≤ 2.00 ≤ 2.34
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp --- 915
0 1 2
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Normal Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00000%
n <LSL 0
p>USL ---
n >USL ---
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
6s 543.37
R 457
T ---
x+3s 4316.08
xmax 4251
USL ---
x-3s 3772.71
xmin 3794
LSL 3500
x 4044.39
Tm ---
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 3500 USL
Char.No. Tensile Unit N/50mm 0 LSL 3500
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:22:22 PM to 5/11/2010 12:22:22 PM Remark
3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200
Weft [N/50mm] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL x
Xlo3
Xup3
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Relative frequency [%] →
3500 3700 3900 4100
Weft [N/50mm] MD →
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Absolute frequency →
LSL x
Xlo3 Xup3
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 Weft [N/50mm] MD →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x
Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 2.36 ≤ 2.82 ≤ 3.29
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp --- 915
0 1 2
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Mixed Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00000%
n <LSL 0
p>USL ---
n >USL ---
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 399.49
R 385
T ---
Xup3 4255.80
xmax 4249
USL ---
Xlo3 3856.31
xmin 3864
LSL 3500
x 4051.70
Tm ---
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 35 10 USL 45
Char.No. Elongation Unit % -10 LSL 25
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:22:45 PM to 5/11/2010 12:22:45 PM Remark
25 30 35 40 45
Warp [%] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL USL
x
Xlo3
Xup3
0 4 8 12 16 20
Relative frequency [%] →
25 30 35 40 45
Warp [%] MD →
0 5 10 15 20 25
Absolute frequency →
LSL x USL
Xlo3 Xup3
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
25 30 35 40 45
Warp [%] MD →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x USL
Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were not met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.00 ≤ 1.21 ≤ 1.42
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp 1.17 ≤ 1.40 ≤ 1.63 0 1.671.67
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Mixed Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00003%
n <LSL 0
p>USL 0.00000%
n >USL 0
p<T> 99.99997 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 14.30
R 13
T 20
Xup3 40.80
xmax 40
USL 45
Xlo3 26.49
xmin 27
LSL 25
x 33.69
Tm 35
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 35 10 USL 45
Char.No. Elongation Unit % -10 LSL 25
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:23:08 PM to 5/11/2010 12:23:08 PM Remark
25 30 35 40 45
Weft [%] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL USL
x
Xlo3
Xup3
0 5 10 15 20 25
Relative frequency [%] →
25 30 35 40 45
Weft [%] MD →
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Absolute frequency →
LSL x USL
Xlo3 Xup3
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
25 30 35 40 45
Weft [%] MD →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x USL
Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were not met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 0.88 ≤ 1.07 ≤ 1.26
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp 1.09 ≤ 1.30 ≤ 1.51 0 1.671.67
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Mixed Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.01820%
n <LSL 0
p>USL 0.00000%
n >USL 0
p<T> 99.98180 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 15.40
R 14
T 20
Xup3 40.92
xmax 40
USL 45
Xlo3 25.51
xmin 26
LSL 25
x 33.13
Tm 35
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 170 USL
Char.No. Leg tear Unit N 0 LSL 170
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:23:35 PM to 5/11/2010 12:23:35 PM Remark
180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320
Warp [N] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL x
Xlo3
Xup3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Relative frequency [%] →
180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 Warp [N] MD →
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Absolute frequency →
LSL x
Xlo3 Xup3
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320
Warp [N] MD →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x
Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.79 ≤ 2.15 ≤ 2.51
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp --- 915
0 1 2
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Mixed Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00000%
n <LSL 0
p>USL ---
n >USL ---
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 94.52
R 80
T ---
Xup3 319.55
xmax 310
USL ---
Xlo3 225.04
xmin 230
LSL 170
x 272.96
Tm ---
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 170 USL
Char.No. Leg tear Unit N 0 LSL 170
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:24:03 PM to 5/11/2010 12:24:03 PM Remark
180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340
Weft [N] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
LSL x
Xlo3
Xup3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Relative frequency [%] →
180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 Weft [N] MD →
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Absolute frequency →
LSL x
Xlo3 Xup3
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 Weft [N] MD →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ←
LSL x
Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.63 ≤ 1.97 ≤ 2.30
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp --- 915
0 1 2
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Mixed Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL 0.00000%
n <LSL 0
p>USL ---
n >USL ---
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 134.51
R 120
T ---
Xup3 349.65
xmax 340
USL ---
Xlo3 215.15
xmin 220
LSL 170
x 261.92
Tm ---
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 100.0 0.0 USL 100.0
Char.No. Flammability Unit mm/min LSL
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 1
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:24:34 PM to 5/11/2010 12:24:34 PM Remark
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Warp [mm/min] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
USL
x Xlo3
Xup3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Relative frequency [%] →
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Warp [mm/min] RD [0] →
0 20 40 60 80 100
Absolute frequency → USL x
Xlo3 Xup3
0 20 50 80 95 99 99.9 99.99 99.999
P [%] →
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Warp [mm/min] RD [0] →
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 5 15 40 70 95
1-P [%] ← USL
x Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 6.84 ≤ 8.18 ≤ 9.52
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp --- 915
0 1 2
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Rayleigh Distribution (folded at 0)
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL ---
n <LSL ---
p>USL 0.00000%
n >USL 0
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 18.256 [rt]
R 9.0
T ---
Xup3 12.832 [rt]
xmax 9.0
USL 100.0
Xlo3 -5.425 [rt]
xmin 0.0
LSL ---
x 0.696
Tm ---
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 100.0 0.0 USL 100.0
Char.No. Flammability Unit mm/min LSL
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 1
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:24:53 PM to 5/11/2010 12:24:53 PM Remark
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Weft [mm/min] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
USL
x Xlo3
Xup3
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Relative frequency [%] →
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Weft [mm/min] RD [0] →
0 20 40 60 80 100
Absolute frequency → USL x
Xlo3 Xup3
0 20 50 80 95 99 99.9 99.99 99.999
P [%] →
-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Weft [mm/min] RD [0] →
0.001 0.01 0.1 1 5 15 40 70 95
1-P [%] ← USL
x Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 8.06 ≤ 9.64 ≤ 11.22
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp --- 915
0 1 2
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Rayleigh Distribution (folded at 0)
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL ---
n <LSL ---
p>USL 0.00000%
n >USL 0
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 15.520 [rt]
R 9.0
T ---
Xup3 10.861 [rt]
xmax 9.0
USL 100.0
Xlo3 -4.659 [rt]
xmin 0.0
LSL ---
x 0.544
Tm ---
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
Mach.Descr.
Mach.No.
Char.Descr. Nom.Val. 10.0 0.0 USL 10.0
Char.No. Pliability Unit N LSL
Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 1
Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.
Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.
Evaluation from 5/11/2010 12:25:33 PM to 5/11/2010 12:25:33 PM Remark
5 6 7 8 9 10
[N] →
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
Value No. →
USL
x
Xlo3
Xup3
0 4 8 12 16 20
Relative frequency [%] →
5 6 7 8 9 10
[N] MD →
0 5 10 15 20 25
Absolute frequency → USL x
Xlo3 Xup3
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
P [%] →
5 6 7 8 9 10
[N] MD →
0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99
1-P [%] ← USL
x
Xlo3 Xup3
Q-DAS 1 - Part
The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.76 ≤ 2.11 ≤ 2.47
1.67 1.67 0
Potential Capability index Pp --- 915
0 1 2
Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)
Model distribution Mixed Distribution
ntot 125
neff 125
p<LSL ---
n <LSL ---
p>USL 0.00000%
n >USL 0
p<T> 100.00000 %
n<T> 125
Xup3-Xlo3 3.417
R 3.2
T ---
Xup3 8.033
xmax 7.9
USL 10.0
Xlo3 4.616
xmin 4.7
LSL ---
x 6.266
Tm ---
Statistics Collected Values
Drawing Values
