• No results found

Process Capability AnalysisPlant Dept./Cost./Prod. Op.Name. Act.Date 5/12/2010

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Process Capability AnalysisPlant Dept./Cost./Prod. Op.Name. Act.Date 5/12/2010"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Nom.Val. 275 5 USL 280

Char.No. Weight Unit g/m2 -5 LSL 270

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:18:45 PM to 5/12/2010 10:18:45 PM Remark

269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282

[g/m2] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

LSL USL

x

Xlo3

Xup3

0 4 8 12 16 20

Relative frequency [%] →

270 272 274 276 278 280 282 [g/m2] MD →

0 5 10 15 20 25

Absolute frequency →

LSL x USL

Xlo3 Xup3

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 [g/m2] MD →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ←

LSL x USL

Xlo3 Xup3

Q-DAS 1 - Part

The requirements were not met (Tp,Tpk) Critical performance index Tpk 0.59 ≤ 0.73 ≤ 0.88

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Performance index Tp 0.70 ≤ 0.83 ≤ 0.97 0 1.671.67

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Mixed Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL 0.52823%

n <LSL 0

p>USL 3.25492%

n >USL 1

p<T> 96.21685 %

n<T> 124

Xup3-Xlo3 12.00

R 11

T 10

Xup3 281.50

xmax 281

USL 280

Xlo3 269.50

xmin 270

LSL 270

x 275.87

Tm 275

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(2)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 3500 USL

Char.No. Tensile Unit N/50mm 0 LSL 3500

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:19:06 PM to 5/12/2010 10:19:07 PM Remark

3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400

Warp [N/50mm] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

LSL x

Xlo3

Xup3

0 4 8 12 16 20

Relative frequency [%] →

3600 3800 4000 4200 4400

Warp [N/50mm] MD →

0 5 10 15 20 25

Absolute frequency →

LSL x

Xlo3 Xup3

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 Warp [N/50mm] MD →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ←

LSL x

Xlo3 Xup3

Critical capability index Ppk 1.62 ≤ 1.94 ≤ 2.27

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Capability index Pp --- 915

0 1 2

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Mixed Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL 0.00000%

n <LSL 0

p>USL ---

n >USL ---

p<T> 100.00000 %

n<T> 125

Xup3-Xlo3 601.83

R 569

T ---

Xup3 4390.65

xmax 4369

USL ---

Xlo3 3788.82

xmin 3800

LSL 3500

x 4095.13

Tm ---

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(3)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 3500 USL

Char.No. Tensile Unit N/50mm 0 LSL 3500

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:19:23 PM to 5/12/2010 10:19:23 PM Remark

3500 3600 3700 3800 3900 4000 4100 4200 4300 4400 4500

Weft [N/50mm] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

LSL x

Xlo3

Xup3

0 5 10 15 20 25

Relative frequency [%] →

3600 3800 4000 4200 4400 Weft [N/50mm] MD →

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Absolute frequency →

LSL x

Xlo3 Xup3

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

3500 3700 3900 4100 4300 4500

Weft [N/50mm] MD →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ←

LSL x

Xlo3 Xup3

Q-DAS 1 - Part

The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.81 ≤ 2.17 ≤ 2.53

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Capability index Pp --- 915

0 1 2

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Mixed Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL 0.00000%

n <LSL 0

p>USL ---

n >USL ---

p<T> 100.00000 %

n<T> 125

Xup3-Xlo3 611.51

R 570

T ---

Xup3 4499.65

xmax 4492

USL ---

Xlo3 3888.14

xmin 3922

LSL 3500

x 4220.33

Tm ---

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(4)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 35 10 USL 45

Char.No. Elongation Unit % -10 LSL 25

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:19:44 PM to 5/12/2010 10:19:44 PM Remark

25 30 35 40 45

Warp [%] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

LSL USL

x

Xlo3

Xup3

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Relative frequency [%] →

25 30 35 40 45

Warp [%] MD →

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Absolute frequency →

LSL x USL

Xlo3 Xup3

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

25 30 35 40 45

Warp [%] MD →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ←

LSL x USL

Xlo3 Xup3

Critical capability index Ppk 1.77 ≤ 2.12 ≤ 2.48

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Capability index Pp 2.43 ≤ 2.89 ≤ 3.37 0 1.671.67

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Mixed Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL 0.00000%

n <LSL 0

p>USL 0.00000%

n >USL 0

p<T> 100.00000 %

n<T> 125

Xup3-Xlo3 6.91

R 5

T 20

Xup3 41.11

xmax 40

USL 45

Xlo3 34.20

xmin 35

LSL 25

x 37.66

Tm 35

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(5)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 35 10 USL 45

Char.No. Elongation Unit % -10 LSL 25

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:19:59 PM to 5/12/2010 10:19:59 PM Remark

25 30 35 40 45

Weft [%] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

LSL USL

x

x-3s x+3s

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Relative frequency [%] →

25 30 35 40 45

Weft [%] ND →

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Absolute frequency →

LSL x USL

x-3s x+3s

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

25 30 35 40 45

Weft [%] ND →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ←

LSL x USL

x-3s x+3s

Q-DAS 1 - Part

The requirements were not met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.00 ≤ 1.21 ≤ 1.42

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Capability index Pp 1.87 ≤ 2.23 ≤ 2.60 0 1.671.67

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Normal Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL 0.01429%

n <LSL 0

p>USL 0.00000%

n >USL 0

p<T> 99.98571 %

n<T> 125

6s 8.96

R 5

T 20

x+3s 34.89

xmax 33

USL 45

x-3s 25.94

xmin 28

LSL 25

x 30.42

Tm 35

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(6)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 170 USL

Char.No. Leg tear Unit N 0 LSL 170

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:20:16 PM to 5/12/2010 10:20:16 PM Remark

200 300 400 500 600 700

Warp [N] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

LSL x

x-3s x+3s

0 5 10 15 20 25

Relative frequency [%] →

200 300 400 500 600 700

Warp [N] ND →

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Absolute frequency →

LSL x

x-3s x+3s

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

200 300 400 500 600 700

Warp [N] ND →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ←

LSL x

x-3s x+3s

Critical capability index Ppk 2.32 ≤ 2.78 ≤ 3.25

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Capability index Pp --- 915

0 1 2

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Normal Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL 0.00000%

n <LSL 0

p>USL ---

n >USL ---

p<T> 100.00000 %

n<T> 125

6s 276.15

R 180

T ---

x+3s 692.39

xmax 650

USL ---

x-3s 416.25

xmin 470

LSL 170

x 554.32

Tm ---

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(7)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 170 USL

Char.No. Leg Tear Unit N 0 LSL 170

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:20:33 PM to 5/12/2010 10:20:33 PM Remark

200 300 400 500 600

Weft [N] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

LSL x

Xlo3

Xup3

0 4 8 12 16 20

Relative frequency [%] →

200 300 400 500 600

Weft [N] MD →

0 5 10 15 20 25

Absolute frequency →

LSL x

Xlo3 Xup3

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

200 300 400 500 600

Weft [N] MD →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ←

LSL x

Xlo3 Xup3

Q-DAS 1 - Part

The requirements were met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 4.71 ≤ 5.64 ≤ 6.56

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Capability index Pp --- 915

0 1 2

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Mixed Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL 0.00000%

n <LSL 0

p>USL ---

n >USL ---

p<T> 100.00000 %

n<T> 125

Xup3-Xlo3 135.86

R 120

T ---

Xup3 627.95

xmax 620

USL ---

Xlo3 492.09

xmin 500

LSL 170

x 561.56

Tm ---

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(8)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Warp Nom.Val. 100.000 0.000 USL 100.000

Char.No. Flammability Unit mm/min LSL

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 3

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:20:51 PM to 5/12/2010 10:20:51 PM Remark

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Warp [mm/min] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

USL

x

Xlo3

Xup3

0 4 8 12 16 20

Relative frequency [%] →

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Warp [mm/min] MD →

0 5 10 15 20 25

Absolute frequency → USL x

Xlo3 Xup3

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Warp [mm/min] MD →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ← USL

x

Xlo3 Xup3

Critical capability index Ppk 0.94 ≤ 1.14 ≤ 1.35

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Capability index Pp --- 915

0 1 2

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Mixed Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL ---

n <LSL ---

p>USL 0.00003%

n >USL 0

p<T> 99.99997 %

n<T> 125

Xup3-Xlo3 82.23311

R 78.100

T ---

Xup3 92.41636

xmax 90.000

USL 100.000

Xlo3 10.18325

xmin 11.900

LSL ---

x 40.01760

Tm ---

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(9)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Weft Nom.Val. 100.000 0.000 USL 100.000

Char.No. Flammability Unit mm/min LSL

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 3

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:21:08 PM to 5/12/2010 10:21:08 PM Remark

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Weft [mm/min] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

USL

x

Xlo3

Xup3

0 5 10 15 20 25

Relative frequency [%] →

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Weft [mm/min] MD →

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Absolute frequency → USL x

Xlo3 Xup3

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Weft [mm/min] MD →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ← USL

x

Xlo3 Xup3

Q-DAS 1 - Part

The requirements were not met (Pp,Ppk) Critical capability index Ppk 1.02 ≤ 1.23 ≤ 1.45

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Capability index Pp --- 915

0 1 2

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Mixed Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL ---

n <LSL ---

p>USL 0.00011%

n >USL 0

p<T> 99.99989 %

n<T> 125

Xup3-Xlo3 72.59965

R 70.000

T ---

Xup3 88.33921

xmax 87.300

USL 100.000

Xlo3 15.73957

xmin 17.300

LSL ---

x 38.44080

Tm ---

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(10)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Nom.Val. 10.0 0.0 USL 10.0

Char.No. Pliability Unit N LSL

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 1

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:21:34 PM to 5/12/2010 10:21:34 PM Remark

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

[N] →

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

USL x

x-3s x+3s

0 5 10 15 20 25

Relative frequency [%] →

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [N] ND →

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Absolute frequency →

USL x

x-3s x+3s

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [N] ND →

0.001 0.1 5 30 70 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ←

USL x

x-3s x+3s

Critical performance index Tpk -4.54 ≤ -3.90 ≤ -3.26

1.67 1.67 0

Potential Performance index Tp --- 915

0 1 2

Calculation method M41 Percentile (0.135%-x-99.865%)

Model distribution Normal Distribution

ntot 125

neff 125

p<LSL ---

n <LSL ---

p>USL 100.00000%

n >USL 125

p<T> 0.00000 %

n<T> 0

6s 4.344

R 2.9

T ---

x+3s 20.643

xmax 19.9

USL 10.0

x-3s 16.299

xmin 17.0

LSL ---

x 18.471

Tm ---

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

(11)

Mach.Descr.

Mach.No.

Char.Descr. Nom.Val. 500 USL

Char.No. Flex abrasion Unit cycles 0 LSL 500

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl. 0

Prod.Type Descr. Gage Grp. Gage Descr.

Production Type Gage No. Gage Res.

Evaluation from 5/12/2010 10:22:01 PM to 5/12/2010 10:22:01 PM Remark

500 510 520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600

[cycles]

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120

Value No. →

LSL x

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0

Relative frequency [%] →

1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0

[cycles] ---

0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0

Absolute frequency → R = 0

0.001 0.1 5 20 50 80 95 99.5 99.99

P [%] →

1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0 [cycles] ---

0.001 0.1 5 20 50 80 95 99.5 99.99

1-P [%] ← R = 0

Q-DAS 1 - Part

--- 901 R = 0 --- 901

0

0 1 2

ntot 125

neff 125

n <LSL 0

n >USL ---

n<T> 125

R 0

T ---

xmax 600

USL ---

xmin 600

LSL 500

x 600.00

Tm ---

Statistics Collected Values

Drawing Values

References

Related documents

Course no Course title

Typical cases when you need an exception from framework agreement: (i) to copy experiment from published article, (ii) reagents and material in a validated method, to continue

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl..

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl..

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl..

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl..

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl..

Char.Type variable Char.Class significant Rec.Type manual Decimal Pl..