• No results found

FIRST CLASS MAIL

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "FIRST CLASS MAIL "

Copied!
12
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

APPENDIX VII.

FIELD INVENTORY SURVEY ROUTES

vehicle routes

C:,·

areas surveyed on vehicle routes

• • • • • routes and areas surveyed on £oat

_i

(2)

29 May 1987

3165 University Station Laramie, WY 82071

Carol Taylor

US Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Field Office Box 10023

Helena, HT 59626

Dear Carol:

(307) 766-3441

In shipment are five copies each of the status report and recovery plan for Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis (Colorado butterfly plant) as called for by Agreement No. 14-16-0006-84-955(R) between the US Fish and Wildlife Service

<USFWS), the Air Force Regional Civil Engineer for Ballistic Missile Support, and F. E. Warren Air Force Base <WAFB) (90 CSG/CC). A copy of this agreement is enclosed. Changes recommended by the USFWS, Region 6, have been incorpora- ted where not in conflict with recommendations of the Rocky Mountain Heritage Task Force of The Nature Conservancy nor with standard botanical usage.

Significant changes are outlined in detail in a report accompanying this letter. MaJor additions include plot data analyses for the WAFB monitoring sites, and possible channels for Endangered Species Act protection of Colorado butterfly plant on private land.

Please contact me if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Hollis Marriott Wyoming Botanist

(3)

Revisions to

Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis

Status Report and Recovery Plan (Technical Review Draft) of December 15, 1986

Prepared by:

Hollis Marriott

Rocky Mountain Heritage Task Force The Nature Conservancy

3165 University Station Laramie, Wyoming 82071

for:

Region 6

US Fish and Wildlife Service Denver, Colorado

June 15, 1987

I

(4)

CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO THE STATUS REPORT, AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS BY THE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE:

Section I.2.B.1.b.

I.3.A.

I.3.B.

I.5.B.2.

I.7.B.

I. 7 .D.6.

I.7.D.7.

I.7.E.

I.9.A.-D.

I.10.A.

I. 10.B.

Ii.11.

II.12.A.

II.13.A.

The Nature Conservancy <TNC) Heritage ranking ~ystem is ex- plained.

A non-technical description of Colorado butterfly plant has been added.

A discussion of local field characters not found in the litera- ture prior to this study has been added.

Areas covered during the 1984-1986 inventory are explained more clearly (see also III.16.E. and Appendix VII).

Colorado populations have been added.

Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis population numbers on Warren Air Force Base (WAFB) prior to the 1986 Base inventory were discovered to be only estimates. There are no population trend data available other than those from monitoring site plots.

The apparent decrease in Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis populations on WAFB is discussed.

The apparent decrease in Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis populations on WAFS, and the possible influence of community succession are discussed.

Information on land use on WAFS has been updated.

The detrimental effect of overgrazing on Gaura neomexicana ssp.

coloradensis habitat is explained in more detail.

Water development as a potential threat has been explained in greater detail.

The apparent decrease in Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis populations on WAFB, and the WAFB Management Plan are mentioned.

Reasons for the Rocky Mountain Heritage Task Force CRMHTF) recommendation to the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) concerning listing of Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis are presented. Included are possible channels for Endangered Species Act protection on private land.

"Critical habitat boundaries" has been changed to "Critical habitat boundaries, as· understood at this time," to point out that more biological data ar• needed before precise critical habitat boundaries can be established.

(5)

II.14.B.

II .15.

III.16.C.

III.16.E.

The need for continued monitoring on WAFB is mentioned.

A few additions to the list of Interested Parties have been made.

The specimen marked by the USFWS as "not on map" is part of Occurrence No. 17, a map of which is included in Appendix I.

Recent fieldwork is explained in more detail.

Common plant names have been included in the text of the report.

Several appendices have been added (numbers have been changed for binding purposes):

Appendix

IV. Definition of element ranks, Natural Herjtage Program, The Nature Conservancy

v.

VI.

VIII.

Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis monitoring studies, F. E. Warren Air Force Base, 1984 through 1986.

Site descriptions and ownership.

Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis inventory, F. E. Warren Air Force Base, 1986.

In Appendix I, Occurrence 09, a small Section 10 has been added to the map.

northwest corner of Section 34 on the been added to Appendix VIII.

population in the northwest corner of Occurrence 17 has been extended into the map. A map of Colorado survey routes has

(6)

CHANGES AND ADDITIONS TO THE RECOVERY PLAN, AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS BY THE US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE:

Section Part I.

History

Description Distribution Habitat and Biology

Threats

Part II.

A clearer explanation of populations known prior to this study is given (page 1). No population data are available .from the 1981 survey of sites on WAFB (page 1).

A non-technical description has been added <page 3).

A clearer explanation of survey routes is included (page 4).

Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis population trends on WAFB, and the possible influence of community succession are

discussed.

Evidence that overgrazing is detrimental to Colorado butterfly plant habitat is included. The list of threats has been

revised following recommendations made by the USFWS.

Steo-Down Outline 1.5

2.2

2.4

4. E,

Narrative 1.5

2.

2.2 2.4

A section on possible Endangered Species Act (ESA) protection for Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis on private land has been added.

Neither The Nature Conservancy nor the RMHTF is under contract to provide a Habitat Management Plan if a Gaura neomexicana ssp.

coloradensis Research Natural Area is designated on WAFB.

"Widely dispersed" is explained in the corresponding section of the Narrative.

Possible research topics are included in the corresponding section of the Narrative.

A section on possible ESA protection for Gaura neomexicana ssp.

coloradensis on private land has been added.

The need for defining critical habitat is discussed in 2.4.

See Steo-Down Outline 2.2 above.

The RMHTF is not under contract to establish precise boundaries

(7)

2.5

4.4.

of critical habitat. To do so would require long-term moni- toring as explained in 2.4.

Possible ESA protection for Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis on private land is discussed in 1.5.

Overgrazing is discussed under Threats.

The appendix of photographs has been deleted. These are included in the text of the status report. One appendix has been added:

Appendix III. Recommended Conservation Sites

(8)

'///

,,,.•:,

FIRST CLASS MAIL

4 -

A

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY

ROCKY MOUNTAIN HERITAGE TASK FORCE 1370 PENNSYLVANIA STREET, SUITE 190

DENVER, COLORADO 80203 (303) 860-9142

Hollis Marriott

3165 University Station Laramie, WY 82071

• FmST CLASS MAIL "

I

(9)

- -<...=;'-. ,-- · ' ' .. ~-}::·

-·i ~ :-:(.~~. ,.l

' /

/

•- ...I - c( .,, - :D

en

:E -I

(/) 0

U) c( r

)>

..J CJ)

0 en

1-- s:

I

a: U) l>

- - -r

LL

9½x 12½

-VQ.s Stock#R1530' ·.. .

SUrVI . . (Old.Stock#R9.512\56FF)

(10)

GRE:

Vehie/e. ~2 45'

-

_ ..,..

=-

,._

.:; • 7

un Ct.,!>

--,...___-..)

+ -

I I

_,,--,

'J I .. ;c,

c'\--

4635

-.l--~~~-,1 -,-:-'

4677

. ' ..

I ,,

6-

N,n,J n,11

! .. ~5

~ ; -.

· - -'I W1ndmlll.

-15d'.>'

I ••

45/J ·

· - -6

R '

15' 2

fa,,.,

5.l80

I Wi I

~ : l - - - - \ H - ,-I I

(11)

••

a ::, 0

u

..

z

w .

T 21

I- N

I-

_J

'T 20

N Q.

>-

....

~

::,

oz u

:

::)

JI T

0 19

.

N

:u

w

--

=

---J~----

I()

(

· ~

~

22

'\ ~~ ..

-··

~

)4

I

I ... ,.~ ...

:--.:>.b

~ {

R65~

I

II D

II II II

Z)

II II

\ H

S H [ [ T

liiw

-

---

IZ

2~

L A

L A • t . 1 1 1 1 [ C O U N T Y

I) l•

lV

·---'·

R62W

R A M E 0 u N T S N [ C T y

T 21 N

20 21

R60W

1 . • • • 1 1 1 1 [ C O U N T Y

(/)

LL.

LL.

=><t

..J

Cl)

a:J '

'

Ill

.... ....

m-~ 0

u

T 19 N

II)

LLI

z

0

u

a: w z z

-

CD

(12)

N

I-

1T 4 N

2, 22 2,

,,

II II

28 ·11 27 26 25 II 29 211

II II

pc::m::11e11q- - - - l ~ - - - - - - ---71----,r---

34 35

II

33 11 34

II ...___ II

,, II 2--771..._____

II II II

II

- - - - II

.

12 II II 9

II

104°20'

1T 5 N

0

22 2,

27

c:x:

>- ~

f- z CJ) ::::>

0 0 c:x:

~-ii

T 13 N

<l al

:E CD

w

z

References

Related documents

ALVIN selects a new story and hands it to THOMAS, taking the Butterfly pages as he does. Over

The purpose of this study is to analyse the different types of enchantment generated in the marketing of outdoor brands from a time perspective, using nostalgia and brand

Warren Air Force Base (WAFB), west of Cheyenne, Wyoming, was surveyed for populations of Gaura neomexicana ssp. Populations of Gaura neomexicana ssp. coloradensis

From the outside fairly well-defined, but yet very much contested, uses in of the castles in Cape Coast and Elmina to the local culture museum at Fort Apollonia in Beyin via the

Denys Calvaert, Amor and Psyche, 1568, oil on canvas, copyright Stockholm University, 2020, X-ray image.. Denys Calvaert, Amor and Psyche, 1568 oil on canvas, cm 75 x cm 59, copyright

Terrestrial molluscs, some vascular forest plants, and those bryophytes and lichenized fungi classified as ‘perennial stayers’ in life history strategy classification, might be used

Previous studies have demonstrated a positive impact of robotic telepresence on social interactions [1] and social presence [21]. The participants in our study also believed that

(GOCO), the Nature Conservancy, a private nonprofit conservation organization, contracted the Colorado Natural Heritage Program to inventory Mineral County for areas of