Aarnio, Aulis, The Rational as Reasonable – A Treatise on Legal Justification, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987.
Andenæs, Kristian., Rettsvitenskap og empiri – om empiriske undersøkelser av rett-
skildebruken, i Basse, Ellen M. & Jensen, Vibeke (red.), Regulering og
styring III – et bidrag til den juridiske forskeruddannelse, (s. 107–122), København, 1992.
Areeda, Phillip, Comment: Always a Borrower – Law and Other Disciplines,
Duke Law Journal, 5, (s. 1029–1043), 1988.
Balking, J.M., Interdisciplinarity as Colonization, Washington and Lee Law
Review, 53(3), (s. 949–970), 1996.
Barton, Thomas D., Conceiving the Lawyer as Creative Problem Solver – Introduction, California Western Law Review, 34(2), (s. 267–271), 1998. Becher, Tony & Trowler, Paul, Academic Tribes and Territories – Intellectual
Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines, 2 uppl., Open University Press, Phil-
adelphia, 2001.
Bodig, Matyas, Legal Doctrinal Scholarship and Interdisciplinary Engage- ment, Erasmus Law Review, 8(2), (s. 43–54), 2015.
Boix Mansilla, Veronica & Duraising, Elisabeth D., Targeted Assessment of Student’s Interdisciplinary Work – An Empirically Grounded Frame- work Proposed, The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), (s. 215–237), 2007. Bradney, Anthony, Law as a Parasitic Discipline, Journal of Law and Society,
25(1), (s. 71-84), 1998.
Chynoweth, Paul, Legal Research, i Knight, Andrew (red.), Advanced Re- search Methods in the Built Environment, (s. 28–37), John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Hoboken, 2009.
Connolly, Kim Diana, Elucidating the Elephant – Interdisciplinary Law School Classes, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, vol 11, (s. 11–62), 2003.
Cooper, James M., Towards a New Architecture – Creative Problem Solving and the Evolution of Law, California Western Law Review, 34(2), (s. 297– 323), 1998.
Dahlberg-Larsen, Jørgen, Hvorfor interessere sig for andre samfundsvidenska-
ber?, i Basse, Ellen M. & Jensen, Vibeke (red.), Regulering og styring III
– et bidrag til den juridiske forskeruddannelse, (s. 57–73), København, 1992.
Dahlman, Christian, Rätt och rättfärdigande – En tematisk introduktion i allmän
rättslära, 2 uppl., Studentlitteratur, Lund, 2010.
Daicoff, Susan, Lawyer, Know Thyself – A Review om Empirical Research on Attorney Attributes Bearing on Professionalism, American University
Law Review, 46(5), (s. 1337–1428), 1997.
D’errico, Peter, Arons, Stephen & Rifkin, Janet, Humanistic Legal Studies at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Journal of Legal Education, 28(1), (s. 18–39), 1976.
Diesen, Christian, Felkällor vid bevisprövning, i Holgersen, Gudrun, Krüger, Kai och Lilleholt, Kåre (red.), Festskrift till Nils Nygaard – Nybrott og odling, (s. 1–16), Fagbokforlaget, Bergen, 2002.
Doublet, David R. & Bernt, Jan Fridthjof, Retten og vitenskapen – en intro-
duksjon til rettvitenskapens vitenskapsfilosofi, 2 uppl., Alma Mater, Bergen,
1993.
Ebbesson, Jonas & van der Sluijs, Jessika, Större perspektiv och kritiskt förhåll-
ningssätt i juristutbildningen, JT 2017/18 nr. 3, (s. 549–559).
Edwards, Harry T., The Growing Disjunction Between Legal Education and the Legal Profession, Michigan Law Review, 91(1), (s. 34–78), 1992. Eisenberg, Theodore, Why Do Empirical Legal Scholarship, San Diego Law
Review, 41(4), (s. 1741–1746), 2004.
Epstein, Lee & King, Gary, The Rules of Inference, The University of Chicago
Law Review, 69(1), (s. 1–133), 2002.
Fischman, Joshua B., Reuniting Is and Ought in Empirical Legal Scholarship,
Gardner, Howard, The Disciplined Mind – What All Students Understand, Si- mon & Schuster, New York, 1999.
Harris, Cyril M. & Rosenthal, Albert J., The Interdisciplinary Course in the Legal Aspects of Noise Pollution at Columbia University, Journal of Legal
Education, vol. 31(1/2), (s. 128–133), 1981.
Heise, Michael, The Past, Present, and Future of Empirical Legal Scholar- ship – Judicial Decision Making and the New Empiricism, University of
Illinois Law Review, 2002(4), (s. 819–850), 2002.
Hellner, Jan, Metodproblem i rättsvetenskapliga arbeten – Studier i förmögenhets-
rätt, Jure, Stockholm-Visby, 2001.
Hellner, Jan, Rättsteori – en introduktion, Juristförlaget, Stockholm, 1988
Hellner, Jan, Argumentation de lege ferenda, SvJT 1975, (s. 401–420).
Ho, Daniel E. & Kramer, Larry, Introduction – The Empirical Revolution in Law, Stanford Law Review, 65(6), (s. 1195–1202), 2013.
Hollander, David A., Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship – What Can We Learn from Princeton’s Long-Standing Tradition, Law Library Journal, 99(4), (s. 771–792), 2007.
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr., The Path of the Law, Harvard Law Review, vol. 10, 1987, tillgänglig: http://moglen.law.columbia.edu/LCS/palaw.pdf.
Holtermann, Jakob V.H. & Madsen, Mikael R., Toleration, Synthesis or Re- placement? – The ’Empirical Turn’ and Its Consequences of the Science of International Law, Leiden Journal of International Law, 29(4), (s. 1001– 1019), 2016.
Hydén, Håkan, Rättssociologi som rättsvetenskap, Studentlitteratur, Lund 2002. Jareborg, Nils, Rättsdogmatik som vetenskap, SvJT 2004, (s. 1–10).
Kandel, Randy Frances, Foreword: Whither the Legal Whale – Interdisci- plinarity and the Socialization of Professional Identity, Loyola of Los An-
geles Law Review, 27(1), (s. 9–24), 1993.
Kleineman, Jan, Rättsdogmatisk metod, i Nääv, Maria & Zamboni, Mauro (red.), Juridisk metodlära, 2 uppl., (s. 21–46), Studentlitteratur, Lund, 2018.
Leeuw, Frans L., Empirical Legal Research – The Gap Between Facts and Values and Legal Academic Training, Utrecht Law Review, 11(2), (s. 19– 33), 2015.
Lehrberg, Bert, Rättsvetenskap i praktikens tjänst? Tankar rörande civilrättsforsk-
ningens arbetsuppgifter, SvJT 1991, (s. 754–768).
Lepsius, Oliver, Sozialwissenschaften im Verfassungsrecht – Amerika als Vorbild?, JuristenZeitung, 60(1), (s. 1–13), 2005.
Lilly, Graham C., Law Schools Without Lawyers? Winds of Change in Legal Education, Virginia Law Review, 81(5), (s. 1421–1470), 1995.
Livingston, Michael A., Reinventing Tax Scholarship – Lawyers, Econo- mists, and the Role of the Legal Academy, Cornell Law Review, 83(2), (s. 365–436), 1998.
Llewellyn, Karl N., On What Makes Legal Research Worth While, Legal
Education, 8(4), (s. 399–421), 1956.
McCrudden, Christopher, Legal Research and the Social Sciences, Law Quar-
terly Review, vol. 122, (s. 632–650), 2006.
Meers, Jed, Gibbons, Jenny & Laws, Jenny, Research Magpies – Student Sourcing Behaviours on an Undergraduate Law Degree, Teaching in
Higher Education, (s. 1–17), 2020.
Meier, Joan S., Notes from the Underground – Integrating Psychological and Legal Perspectives on Domestic Violence in Theory and Practice,
Hofstra Law Review, 21(4), (s. 1295–1366), 1993.
Mobjörk, Malin, Berglund, Camilla, Granberg, Mikael & Johansson, Mag- nus, Sustainable Development and Cross-Disciplinary Research Educa- tion – Challenges and Opportunities for Learning, Högre utbildning, 10(1), (s. 76–89), 2020.
Morton, Linda, Taras, Howard & Reznik, Vivian, Teaching Interdisciplinary Collaboration – Theory, Practice, and Assessment, Quinnipiac Health Law
Journal, 13(2), (s. 175–202), 2010.
Nissani, Moti, Ten Cheers for Interdisciplinarity – The Case for Interdisci- plinary Knowledge and Research, Social Science Journal, 34(2), (s. 201– 216), 1997.
Nissani, Moti, Fruits, Salads, and Smoothies – A Working Definition of In- terdisciplinarity, Journal of Educational Thought, 29(2), (s. 121–128), 1995. Nkansah, Lydia A. & Chimbwanda, Victor, Interdisciplinary Approach to Le-
gal Scholarship – A Blend from the Qualitative Paradigm, Asian Journal
of Legal Education, 3(1), (s. 55–71), 2016.
Olsen, Lena, Rättsvetenskapliga perspektiv, SvJT 2004, (s. 105–145).
Peczenik, Aleksander, Vad är rätt? – Om demokrati, rättssäkerhet, etik och juri-
disk argumentation, Fritze, Stockholm, 1995.
Petrusson, Ulf, Den rättsvetenskapliga forskningens roll – Vad bör den rättsveten-
skapliga forskningen syssla med och varför? Rapport från rättssymposium den 22–23 november 2001 på Häringe slott, SvJT 2002, (s. 217–234).
Pound, Roscoe, The Scope and Purpose of Sociological Jurisprudence III,
Harvard Law Review, 25(6), (s. 489–516), 1912.
Ridley, Ann, Legal Skills for Non-Law Students – Added Value or Irrelevant Diversion?, Law Teacher, 28(3), (s. 281–291), 1994.
Rodhe, Knut, Beskrivning – prognos – rekommendation – En trosbekännelse, JT 1996/96, (s. 1–4).
Roux, Theunis, Judging the Quality of Legal Research – A Qualified Re- sponse to the Demand for Greater Methodological Rigour, Legal Educa-
tion Review, 24(1), (s. 177–204), 2014.
Roux, Theunis, The Incorporation Problem in Interdisciplinary Legal Re- search – Some Conceptual Issues and a Practical Illustration, Erasmus
Law Review, 8(2), (s. 55–64), 2015.
Samuelson, Paul A., The Convergence of the Law School and the University,
The American Scholar, 44(2), (s. 246–271), 1975.
Sandgren, Claes, Om empiri och rättsvetenskap (del I), JT 1995/96 nr. 3, (s. 726–748).
Sandgren, Claes, Om empiri och rättsvetenskap (del II), JT 1995/96 nr. 4, (s. 1035–1059).
Sandgren, Claes, Om teoribildning och rättsvetenskap, JT 2004/05, (s. 29–333). Sandgren, Claes, Att söka anslag för rättsvetenskaplig forskning, JT 2005/06, (s.
349–365).
Sandgren, Claes, Vad är rättsvetenskap? i Wahlgren, Peter & Magnusson Sjö- berg, Cecilia (red.), Festskrift till Peter Seipel, (s. 527–552), Norstedts ju- ridik, Stockholm, 2006.
Sandström, Marie, Rätt eller vetenskap? Till frågan om rättsvetenskapens nytta, SvJT 2002, (s. 282–293).
Saunders, Angharad, Revisiting the Skills Agenda – A Complicated Geogra- phy, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 35(4), (s. 465–477), 2011. Schauer, Frederick & Wise, Virginia, J., Nonlegal Information and the Dele-
galization of Law, The Journal of Legal Studies, 49(1), (s. 495–515), 2000. Schlegel, John Henry, American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science
– From the Yale Experience, Buffalo Law Review, 28(3), (s. 459–586), 1979.
Schlegel, John H., American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science, Uni- versity of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1995.
Schlossberg, Dina, An Examination of Transactional Law Clinics and Inter- disciplinary Education, Washington University Journal of Law & Policy, vol. 11, (s. 195–236), 2003.
Schrama, Wendy, How to Carry out Interdisciplinary Legal Research – Some Experiences with an Interdisciplinary Research Method, Utrecht Law Re-
view, 7(1), (s. 147–162), 2011.
Spaak, Torben, Rättspositivism och juridisk argumentation, JT 2005/06, (s. 563– 597).
Suchman, Mark C. & Mertz, Elisabeth, Toward a New Legal Empiricism – Empirical Legal Studies and New Legal Realism, Annual Review of Law
Taekema, Sanne, Relative Autonomy – A Characterization of the Discipline of
Law, i van Klink, Bart & Taekema, Sanne (red.), Law and Method – In-
terdisciplinary Research into Law, (s. 33–52), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2011.
Taekema, Sanne & van der Burg, Wibren, Introduction – The incorporation Problem in Interdisciplinarity Legal Research, Part 1: Theoretical Dis- cussions, Erasmus Law Review, 8(2), (s. 39–42), 2015.
Thomas, Alice M., Laying the Foundation for Better Student Learning in the Twenty-First Century – Incorporating an Integrated Theory of Legal Education into Doctrinal Pedagogy, Widener Law Symposium Journal, 6, (s. 49–138), 2000.
Thompson, William C. & Schumann, Edward L., Interpretation of Statistical Evidence in Criminal Trials – The Prosecutor’s Fallacy and the Defense Attorney’s Fallacy, Law and Human Behavior, vol. 11, (s. 167–187), 1987. Ulen, Thomas S., The Impending Train Wreck in Current Legal Education – How we Might Teach Law as the Scientific Study of Social Governance,
University of St. Thomas Law Journal, 6(2), (s. 302–336), 2009.
Vick, Douglas, W., Interdisciplinarity and the Discipline of Law, Journal of
Law and Society, 32(2), (s. 163–193), 2004.
Wahlgren, Peter, Syfte och nytta med rättsvetenskapliga arbeten, SvJT 2002, (s. 293–303).
Weinberg, Anita & Harding, Carol, Interdisciplinary Teaching and Collabo- ration in Higher Education – A Concept Whose Time has Come, Wash-
ington University Journal of Law & Policy, vol. 14, (s. 15–48), 2004.
Weinstein, Janet, Coming of Age – Recognizing the Importance of Interdis- ciplinary Education in Law Practice, Washington Law Review, 74(2) (s. 319–366), 1999.
Westberg, Peter, Avhandlingsskrivande och val av forskningsansats – En idé om
rättsvetenskaplig öppenhet, i Heuman, Lars (red.), Festskrift till Per Olof
Bolding, (s. 421–446), Juristförlaget, Stockholm, 1992.
White, James Boyd, Doctrine in a Vacuum – Reflections on What a Law School Ought (and Ought not) to be, Journal of Legal Education, 36(2), (s. 155–166), 1986.
Wilhelmsson, Thomas, Om kritisk civilrättsdogmatik, i Basse, Ellen M. (red.), Regulering og styring II – till fornyelse af den juridiske teori og metode, (s. 47–63), København, 1990.
Zimmerman, Emily, An Interdisciplinary Framework for Understanding and Cultivating Law Student Enthusiasm, DePaul Law Review, 58(4), (s. 851– 918), 2009.